green
Positive treatment
9.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cathy Mitchell v. Department of the Treasury
See Lapedis v. Department of Health and Human Services, 47 M.S.P.R. 337 , 342, aff’d, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Diana Stephens v. Department of Veterans Affairs
See Lapedis v. Department of Health and Human Services, 47 M.S.P.R. 337 , 342, aff’d, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Damien L Ware v. Department of Veterans Affairs
See Lapedis v. Department of Health and Human Services, 47 M.S.P.R. 337 , 342, aff’d, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pheng Khov v. Department of Health and Human Services
See Lapedis v. Department of Health and Human Services, 47 M.S.P.R. 337 , 340, aff’d, 949 F.2d 403 , (1991) (Table); Gaff v. Department of Transportation, 45 M.S.P.R. 387 , 390 n.2 (1990); cf. Walls v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 29 F.3d 1578, 1583-84 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Pacific Coast Community Services, Inc. v. United States
See Halifax Eng’g, Inc. v. United States, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Heim v. United States
(2×)
See Heim v. United States, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.Cir.1991) (table). 2 Just under thirteen years after plaintiff first applied to the ABCMR, on September 12, 1996, plaintiff submitted a petition to the ABCMR for reconsideration of the Board’s original 1985 decision.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sloan v. United States
See, e.g., Heim v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 341, 344 , aff'd, 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huber v. United States
The Federal Circuit has held that payment to an inactive reservist under subsec tion 206(a) is limited to compensation for duties actually performed, Banks, 901 F.2d at 1087 ; see also Heim v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 341 , 343-44 aff'd 949 F.2d 403 (Fed.Cir.1991), or for duties that would have been performed but for disability, illness, or disease, Dehne, 970 F.2d at 893 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Juan P. Cedillo
v.
The United States
v.
The United States
91-5103.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 10, 1991.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Juan P. CEDILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-5103.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Oct. 10, 1991.
On Appeal from the United States Claims Court, in Case No(s). 91-1072 C.
Cl Ct
AFFIRMED.
RICH, MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.
Judgment
PER CURIAM:
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.