James Stieber v. Signal Delivery Serv., Inc. & Truck Drivers Union Local 407, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
James Stieber v. Signal Delivery Serv., Inc. & Truck Drivers Union Local 407, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clemmie Lee Spencer v. United States of America (alnd, 2026-04-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Clemmie Lee Spencer v. United States of America
N.D. Ala. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. George Skouteris, Jr.
6th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kean, 1991 WL 270828, at *4 , 951 F.2d 350 (Table) (6th Cir. 1991) (per curiam); see also United States v. Simmonds, 931 F.2d 685, 689 (10th Cir. 1991) (collecting cases).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Shields (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846, 854 , 105 S.Ct. 2992, 2996-97 , 86 L.Ed.2d 664 (1985) (prior to reaching any constitutional questions, federal courts must consider nonconstitutional grounds for decision). 12 .The government contends, relying on United States v. Lewis, 762 F.Supp. 1314 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir.1991) (table), that the 1988 amendment to § 841(b) made "the entire plant in effect a mixture or substance containing marijuana" so that "both dead and alive, harvested and unharvested” plants are marijuana plants under the . statute.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dana Ray Morrison (2×)
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lorenzo, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Elmer Arias Acosta (2×)
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lewis, 762 F.Supp. 1314, 1315-18 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bennie Doyce Skinner
11th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Clearly, the defendant’s actual use of the weapon was not for lawful sport because “[s]elf-defense or self-protection is not sport or recreation.” Id. at 928 ; see also, e.g., United States v. Lorenzo, No. 91-3106, 951 F.2d 350 (Table), 1991 WL 270815, at *2 , 1991 U.S. App.LEXIS 30211, at *4 (6th Cir. Dec. 19, 1991) (unpublished opinion) (disallowing section 2K2.1(b) reduction when defendant actually fired the weapon in his house after a dispute with his wife because “[s]uch use is not for sport”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert Holmes (91-3735), Daniel Ross (91-3774)
6th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lewis, 762 F.Supp. 1314, 1315 (E.D.Tenn.) (rejected claim that Sentencing Guidelines § 2Dl.l’s “equivalency” was unconstitutional because it lacked a rational basis), aff'd, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir.1991). *602 Holmes and Ross also rely on United States v. Streeter, 907 F.2d 781 (8th Cir.1990), and United States v. Prine, 909 F.2d 1109 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2263 , 114 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991), to support their due process argument.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Watson
D. Conn. · 1992 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Osburn, 756 F.Supp. at 575 (court stated that the record demonstrated that no group of plants could produce an average of 1000 grams of marijuana and it is highly unlikely that any single plant could ever produce 1000 grams of marijuana) with United States v. Lewis, 762 F.Supp. 1314, 1316 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 951 F.2d 350 (6th Cir.1991) (court stated that one marijuana plant can reasonably be expected to produce a kilogram of a mixture or substance containing marijuana).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Stieber
v.
Signal Delivery Service, Inc. And Truck Drivers Union Local 407
91-3321.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 20, 1991.
951 F.2d 350
Unpublished

951 F.2d 350

142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2232

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James STIEBER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SIGNAL DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. and Truck Drivers Union Local
407, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-3321.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1991.

Before KENNEDY and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges; and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Plaintiff, James E. Stieber, appeals summary judgment for the defendants, Signal Delivery Service, Inc. and Truck Drivers Union Local 407, in this action for breach of the bargaining agreement and for breach of the duty of fair representation following plaintiff's layoff. The district court found that Stieber had not met his burden of proving that the union had breached its duty of fair representation.

2

Upon consideration of the entire record, the briefs, filed herein, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated by District Court Judge Alvin I. Krenzler in his memorandum filed March 18, 1991.