green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Oxford House Inc v. Township of North Bergen
See United States v. Borough of Audubon, N.J., 797 F. Supp. 353, 360 (D.N.J. 1991), aff’d, 968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir. 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Start, Inc. v. Baltimore County, Md.
See United States v. Borough of Audubon, 797 F.Supp. 353, 362 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir.1992). 7 The Second Circuit, however, has described The notion that the denial of rights may simultaneously constitute interference with those rights as a “somewhat peculiar argument” and “declin[ed] to believe that Congress ever intended such a statutory overlap.” Frazier v. Rominger, 27 F.3d 828, 833-34 (2d Cir.1994); see also People Helpers Found. v. City of Richmond, 781 F.Supp. 1132, 1134 (E.D.Va.1992) (noting that “most of the [FHA] is designed to prevent illegal discriminatio…
cited
Cited "see"
Wesley Group Home Ministries v. HALLANDALE
See United States v. Borough of Audubon, New Jersey, 797 F.Supp. 353, 360 (N.J.1991), affirmed, 968 F.2d 14 (3rd Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.
See Ponzoni v. Kraft General Foods, Inc., 774 F.Supp. 299, 315 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3rd Cir.1992) (when acceptance is by conduct, the court must look to the objective circumstances rather than the subjective intent of the party); Project Development Group, Inc. v. O.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Community Services, Inc. v. Heidelberg Township
Trust, 257 F.Supp.2d at 227 (“[E]ven where individual members of government are found not to be biased themselves, plaintiffs can demonstrate a violation of the FHA if they can show that discriminatory governmental actions are taken in response to a significant community bias.”); see also United States v. Borough of Audubon, 797 F.Supp. 353, 361 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Charleston v. Sleepy Hollow Youth, Inc.
See Dailey v. City of Lawton, 425 F.2d 1037, 1039 (10th Cir.1970) (holding, in a § 1983 racial discrimination action, that “it is enough for the complaining parties to show that the local officials are effectuating the discriminatory designs of private individuals”); see also United States v. Borough of Audubon, 797 F.Supp. 353, 361 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3rd Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hispanics United of DuPage County v. Village of Addison
Although the court ultimately found, on appeal after remand, that civil penalties were not warranted in that particular case because the facts did not reveal intentional discrimination, the court emphasized that, in cases of intentional discrimination, civil penalties against municipalities are “especially appropriate.” Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. v. City of Taylor, Mich., 102 F.3d 781, 797-98 (6th Cir.1996); see also United States v. Borough of Audubon, N.J., 797 F.Supp. 353 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir.1992) (awarding $10,000 civil penalty against municipal defendant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ryan v. Ramsey
See Hogar Agua y Vida en el Desierto v. Suarez, 829 F.Supp. 19 , 21 n. 1 (D.P.R.1993); A.F.A.P.S., 740 F.Supp. at 103 ; Baxter v. City of Belleville, 720 F.Supp. 720, 729 (S.D.Ill.1989); Support Ministries for Persons with AIDS, Inc., 808 F.Supp. at 129-30 ; 24 C.F.R. § 100.201 (a)(2); see also United States v. Borough of Audubon, 797 F.Supp. 353, 359 (D.N.J.1991), aff'd, 968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir.1992).
United States
v.
Borough of Audubon, New Jersey
v.
Borough of Audubon, New Jersey
91-5821.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 22, 1992.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
U.S.
v.
Borough of Audubon, New Jersey
NO. 91-5821
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
May 22, 1992
Appeal From: D.N.J.,
Gerry, J.
1
AFFIRMED.