green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Paparozzi
See Johnson v. Fauver, 786 F.Supp. 442 (D.N.J.1992), aff'd 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re J.M.
See Janicsko v. Pellman, 774 F.Supp. 331 (M.D.Pa.1991), aff'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) (where foster son informed police that plaintiff had threatened to kill her husband’s mistress and to harm herself, and plaintiff locked herself in ear, refusing to cooperate with police and eventually forcing police to break into plaintiffs car, police had adequate basis for taking plaintiff into custody pursuant to section 7302(a)(2) of the MHPA).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re JM
See Janicsko v. Pellman, 774 F.Supp. 331 (M.D.Pa.1991), aff'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) (where foster son informed police that plaintiff had threatened to kill her husband's mistress and to harm herself, and plaintiff locked herself in car, refusing to cooperate with police and eventually forcing police to break into plaintiff's car, police had adequate basis for taking plaintiff into custody pursuant to section 7302(a)(2) of the MHPA).
discussed
Cited "see"
S.P., a Citizen of Takoma Park, Maryland v. The City of Takoma Park, Maryland Robert Phillips, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the Takoma Park Police Department Brian Rich, Individually and in His Capacity as an Officer of the Takoma Park Police Department Unknown and Unidentified Police Officers of the Takoma Police Department Who Were Present at and Involved in the Incidents Complained of Herein, Individually and in Their Capacity as Officers of the Takoma Park Police Department Washington Adventist Hospital Cyril Hardy James Buxbaum Paul O'Brien Carla Cunningham Marlene Wesley, American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, Inc., Amicus Curiae, Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P., Movant
See Janicsko v. Pellman 774 F.Supp. 331, 338 (M.D.Pa.1991) (construing similar provisions of Pennsylvania involuntary commitment statute as protective rather than coercive), aff'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) 9 The American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland filed an amicus brief in support of Peller on this issue only.
discussed
Cited "see"
S.P. v. City of Takoma Park
See Janicsko v. Pellman 774 F.Supp. 331, 338 (M.D.Pa.1991) (construing similar provisions of Pennsylvania involuntary commitment statute as protective rather than coercive), aff'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Rinehart
See, e.g., Janicsko v. Pellman, 774 F.Supp. 331, 341-42 (M.D.Pa.1991), *626 aff 'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) (denying summary judgment because officer may have repeatedly kicked plaintiff, but stating “[t]he other measures used by defendants, the restraints, the pulling of hair, the manhandling, may be viewed as a matter of law the concomitants of a contested arrest.”); Nolin v. Isbell, 207 F.3d 1253, 1255, 1257 (11th Cir.2000)(no excessive force where officer grabbed plaintiff from behind, threw him against a van three or four feet away, kneed him in the back, pushed his head into the s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mierzwa v. United States
See, e.g., Janicsko v. Pellman, 774 F.Supp. 331, 341-42 (M.D.Pa.1991), aff 'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) (denying summary judgment because officer may have repeatedly kicked plaintiff, but stating “[t]he other measures used by defendants, the restraints, the pulling of hair, the manhandling, may be viewed as a matter of law the concomitants of a contested arrest.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leroy Buhl v. Mr. Cooksey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
See Williams v. Bartlett, 44 F.3d 95, 99 (2d Cir.1994) (right is unqualified if request made before start of trial); Chapman v. United States, 553 F.2d 886, 894 (5th Cir. 1977) (motion timely if made before jury impaneled); United States v. Lorick, 753 F.2d 1295, 1298 (4th Cir.) (request must be asserted before trial), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 2342 , 85 L.Ed.2d 857 (1985); Fritz v. Spalding, 682 F.2d 782, 784 (9th Cir.1982) (request made before jury impanelment is timely); Horton v. Dugger, 895 F.2d 714, 717 (11th Cir.1990) (request untimely because meaningful trial proceedings …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cruz v. City of Wilmington
Compare Lodato v. Township of Evesham, 782 F.Supp. 957, 960-961 (D.N.J.1992) (granting summary judgment because, after approaching reportedly stolen vehicle, officers acted reasonably by drawing weapons, threatening plaintiff and handcuffing her) with Janicsko v. Pellman, 774 F.Supp. 331, 341-342 (M.D.Pa.1991), aff'd, 970 F.2d 899 (3d Cir.1992) (denying summary judgment because officer may have repeatedly kicked plaintiff, but stating “[t]he other measures used by defendants, the restraints, the pulling of hair, the manhandling, may be viewed as a matter of law the concomitants of a conteste…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Motko (David M.)
v.
Sharpe (Ronald), Jordan (Michael), Anzelmi (Frances J.)
v.
Sharpe (Ronald), Jordan (Michael), Anzelmi (Frances J.)
91-6021.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 18, 1992.
Published
Motko (David M.)
v.
Sharpe (Ronald), Jordan (Michael), Anzelmi (Frances J.)
NO. 91-6021
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 18, 1992
Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,
Conaboy, J.
1
AFFIRMED.