green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Zimmerman v. United States (In re Zimmerman)
See In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), aff'd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992). 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(1)(C) provides: “A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debt- or from any debt ... for a tax or a customs duty ... with respect to which the debtor made a fraudulent return or willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat such tax.” The creditor, here, Ap-pellee IRS, bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the debt is nondischargeable under this chapter. .
cited
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Corp. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc. (In re Piper Aircraft Corp.)
See In re Maries, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), affd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir. 1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Corp. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
See In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), aff'd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Corp. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
See In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), aff'd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Colwell v. Royal International Trading Corp.
See In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), aff’d, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. TM Building Products, Ltd.
See In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991), aff'd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levine v. Weissing
Gefen, 35 B.R. at 372 ; see also In re Marks, 131 B.R. 220, 222 (S.D.Fla.1991) (rejecting as lacking merit debtor’s contention that debt- or’s “termination of his Keogh accounts and his subsequent use of liquidated funds to purchase the two annuity contracts” did not constitute a transfer subject to Florida prohibition on fraudulent transfers.), aff'd, 976 F.2d 743 (11th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,625, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1025 in Re: Myron Levine, A.K.A. Mike Levine Jacquelyn P. Levine, A.K.A. Jackie Levine, Debtors. Myron Levine, A.K.A. Mike Levine Jacquelyn Levine, A.K.A. Jackie Levine v. Charles Weissing, Trustee
In upholding the bankruptcy court's application of § 726.105, the district court in Gefen noted that 26 [t]he debtor could have chosen numerous investment vehicles with high rates of return for the proceeds of his I.R.A., or he could have applied them toward payment of the Final Judgment, but instead he chose a rollover into a deferred annuity.... 27 .... 28 The Court finds that the aforementioned transfer of funds made by the debtor had the legal effect and result of hindering, delaying, or defrauding creditors ... 29 Accordingly, the transfer of funds is void and of no effect and the truste…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mayser-Pereira
v.
Mayser-Pereira
91-5155.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 29, 1992.
Published