Warren Reginald Stevenson v. Joseph Haas, 981 F.2d 1251 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Warren Reginald Stevenson v. Joseph Haas, 981 F.2d 1251 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“hen it is clear that the state court will refuse to entertain a habeas petitioner's claim, the prisoner need not exhaust his state remedies, because the prisoner is not required to exhaust a claim when seek relief in the state courts would clearly be futile.”
45 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Griffin v. State of West Virginia (wvsd, 2017-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Griffin v. State of West Virginia
S.D.W. Va · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
hen it is clear that the state court will refuse to entertain a habeas petitioner's claim, the prisoner need not exhaust his state remedies, because the prisoner is not required to exhaust a claim when seek relief in the state courts would clearly be futile.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnlund v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
E.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gotchey, 1992 WL385284, at * 8 n. 23, 981 F.2d 1251 (4th Cir.1992) (unpublished per curiam opinion) (holding that “severe recklessness satisfies scienter requirement” (citation omitted)); Securities and Exchange Commission v. Steadman, 967 F.2d 636, 641 (D.C.Cir.1992); Hollinger v. Titan Capital Corp., 914 F.2d 1564, 1569-70 (9th Cir.1990); In re Phillips Petroleum Sec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warren Reginald Stevenson
v.
Joseph Haas
92-7037.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 21, 1992.
981 F.2d 1251
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: S.D. West Virginia (1)

981 F.2d 1251

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Warren Reginald STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph HAAS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-7037.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992
Decided: December 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-92-145-MJG)

Warren Reginald Stevenson, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Douglas Bennett, United States Attorney, Roann Nichols, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Warren Reginald Stevenson appeals from the district court's order dismissing with prejudice this action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevenson v. Haas, No. CA-92-145MJG (D. Md. Sept. 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED