Chem. Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, & Consol. Cases, 985 F.2d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Chem. Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, & Consol. Cases, 985 F.2d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Select Specialty Hospital of Atlanta v. Thompson (dcd, 2003-11-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Select Specialty Hospital of Atlanta v. Thompson (2×) also: Cited "see"
D.D.C. · 2003 · confidence medium
Id. at 1081-82; Allied-Signal Inc. v. NRC, 988 F.2d 146 , 153 (D.C.Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" National Mining Association v. MSHA
D.C. Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See ICORE, 985 F.2d at 1082.
cited Cited "see" US Telecom Assn v. FCC
D.C. Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See ICORE, Inc. v. FCC, 985 F.2d 1075 , 1080 (D.C.
cited Cited "see" United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See ICORE, Inc. v. FCC, 985 F.2d 1075 , 1080 (D.C.Cir.1993); ALLTEL Corp. v. FCC, 838 F.2d 551, 561-62 (D.C.Cir. 1988).
cited Cited "see" National Rural Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See ICORE, Inc. v. FCC, 985 F.2d 1075 (D.C.Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" National Rural Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., Intervenors. The Organization for the Protection and Advancement of Small Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, Intervenors. National Telephone Cooperative Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Metropolitan Fiber Systems, Inc., Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, National Cable Television Association, Inc., International Communications Association, Tele-Communications Association, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, United Telecommunications, Inc., Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Us West Communications, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Ameritech Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Maryland People's Counsel, Nynex, Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Bellsouth Corporation, South Central Bell and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Alltel Service Corporation, Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Association, United States Telephone Association, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Bell Atlantic, Tele-Communications Association, Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, Central Telephone Company, Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See ICORE, Inc. v. FCC, 985 F.2d 1075 (D.C.Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Department of the Interior
C.D. Cal. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See Idaho Farm Bureau Federation v. Babbitt, 58 F.3d 1392, 1405 (9th Cir.1995) (“Ordinarily when a regulation is not promulgated in compliance with the APA, the regulation is invalid. [ ] However, when equity demands, the regulation can be left in place while the agency follows the necessary procedures.”), citing Western Oil and Gas v. EPA, 633 F.2d 803, 813 (9th Cir.1980); see also ICORE, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 985 F.2d 1075, 1081 (D.C.Cir.1993) (collecting cases remanding a rule to agency without vacating).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., Petitioner,
v.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, and Consolidated Cases
90-1230.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 11, 1993.
985 F.2d 1075
Edwards, Buckley, Henderson.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing, the motion of the Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition for leave to file opposition as amicus curiae, petitioners’ motion for clarification, the responses thereto and of the reply, it is

Ordered, by the Court, that the motion for leave to file as amicus curiae is denied. It is

Further Ordered, by the Court, that the petition for rehearing is denied. The RCRA treatment standards were vacated only insofar as expressly indicated in the September 25, 1992 panel opinion. It is

Further Ordered, by the Court, that the motion for clarification is denied.