green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing Authority (In Re Stoltz)
See Ross v. Metropolitan Dade County, 142 B.R. 1013, 1014-15 (S.D.Fla.1992), aff'd mem., 987 F.2d 774 (11th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of DiCamillo
See also In re Ross, 142 B.R. 1013 (S.D.Fla. 1992), aff'd. 987 F.2d 774 (11th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doris Robinson, Debtor-Appellant v. Chicago Housing Authority, Movant-Appellee
See, e.g., Ross v. Metropolitan Dade County, 142 B.R. 1013, 1015 (S.D.Fla.1992), aff'd without op., 987 F.2d 774 (11th Cir.1993); Talley, 69 B.R. at 224 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McFarland v. Folsom
Finally, the entirety of McFarland’s claims which seek federal declaratory and equitable relief against the defendants based upon alleged violations of state law or the Alabama Constitution are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. 8 Pennhurst State School and Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 , 104 S.Ct. 900 , 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984); see Silver v. Baggiano, 804 F.2d 1211, 1213 (11th Cir.1986); see also Williams v. Adkinson, 792 F.Supp. 755 , 763 n. 12 (M.D.Ala.1992), aff'd, 987 F.2d 774 (11th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mays
v.
Mays
92-4293.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 23, 1993.
Published
U.S.
v.
Mays[*]
NO. 92-4293
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 23, 1993
1
Appeal From: S.D.Fla.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3