green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
“a promissory note is not an 'executory' contract within the meaning of 365(a)”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Sean Rene Michael Burdette
a promissory note is not an 'executory' contract within the meaning of 365(a)
discussed
Cited "see"
Meador v. Oryx Energy Co.
See Meadows, 782 F.Supp. at 1193 ("The many previous James Meadors heirs, assignees of heirs and representatives who have pressed their claims over the years have more than adequately represented the plaintiff."), aff’d, 990 F.2d 626 (5th Cir.1993). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Buswell
Though this Court has held that “the extent of a § 5K1.1 or § 3553(e) departure must be based solely on assistance-related concerns,” 10 there is no evidence in the record that the district court considered 7 See Kinnard v. United States, 313 F.3d 933, 936 (6th Cir. 2002) (“The fact that one defendant received a benefit to which he was not entitled (i.e., a lower sentence based on a weight that was not properly relied on by the sentencing court), does not entitle another defendant to the benefit of the same mistake.”); see also United States v. Peddie, 990 F.2d 626, at *1-2 (5th Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Buswell
See Kinnard v. United States, 313 F.3d 933, 936 (6th Cir. 2002) ("The fact that one defendant received a benefit to which he was not entitled (i.e., a lower sentence based on a weight that was not properly relied on by the sentencing court), does not entitle another defendant to the benefit of the same mistake.”); see also United States v. Peddie, 990 F.2d 626, at *1-2 (5th Cir. 1993) (precedential under 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3) (rejecting—in the context of a § 2255 proceeding—the relevance of appellant’s argument that the district court "erroneously” departed downward on behalf of a co-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Buswell
See Kinnard v. United States, 313 F.3d 933, 936 (6th Cir.2002) ("The fact that one defendant received a benefit to which he was not entitled (i.e., a lower sentence based on a weight that was not properly relied on by the sentencing court), does not entitle another defendant to the benefit of the same mistake.”); see also United States v. Peddie, 990 F.2d 626, at *1-2 (5th Cir.1993) (precedential under 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3) (rejecting — in the context of a § 2255 proceeding — the relevance of appellant’s argument that the district court "erroneously” departed downward on behalf of a c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wojciechowski v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.
An unsworn declaration may substitute for an affiant’s oath if it is made “under penalty of perjury” and is “verified as true and correct.” Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1746 ); see also Washington v. Moore, 990 F.2d 626, 626 (5th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Ogunleye
v.
Ogunleye
92-1998.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 26, 1993.
Published
U.S.
v.
Ogunleye[*]
NO. 92-1998
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Mar 26, 1993
1
Appeal From: N.D.Tex.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2