James Charles Higgs v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 991 F.2d 789 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
James Charles Higgs v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 991 F.2d 789 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stutler v. Tate (wvnd, 2024-09-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Stutler v. Tate
N.D.W. Va. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
Cir. Ct. of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484, 490 (1973); see Gibson v. State of N.C., 991 F.2d 789 (4th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (unpublished) (dismissal of petition under § 2241 denied where state prisoner had not exhausted state remedies); Dean v. State of W.
discussed Cited "see" John Macsherry, Jr. v. Sparrows Point, LLC
4th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hohman v. Dunning, 991 F.2d 789 (table), 1993 WL 127955, at *2 (4th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (finding Rule 38(b) satisfied where pro se plaintiff’s jury demands failed to “include a certificate of service as required by a local court rule”); see also Gargiulo v. Delsole, 769 F.2d 77 , 78–79 (2d Cir. 1985) (finding Rule 38(b) satisfied where defendants’ jury demand was “made on the last page of their answer,” and thus “not in the preferred style”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Charles Higgs
v.
Department of Social Services
93-1016.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 22, 1993.
991 F.2d 789
Unpublished

991 F.2d 789

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Charles HIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-1016.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 29, 1993
Decided: April 22, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-889-R)

James Charles Higgs, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

James Charles Higgs appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Higgs v. Department of Social Services, No. CA-92-899-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED