Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified Sch. Dist. No. 40 Of Pima Cnty., Arizona v. Kirk, 102 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified Sch. Dist. No. 40 Of Pima Cnty., Arizona v. Kirk, 102 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hartunian v. Racusin (ca9, 2005-01-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hartunian v. Racusin
9th Cir. · 2005 · confidence medium
United States v. Cal-Almond, Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1003 (9th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" SVB Financial Trust v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bank and Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A.
N.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cal-Almond Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1004 (9th Cir. 1996).
cited Cited "see" Center for Biological Diversity v. Blm
9th Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cal-Almond Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1002-03 (9th Cir. 1996).
discussed Cited "see" Securities and Exchange Commission, Henry C. Yuen Elsie M. Leung, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc. (2×)
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cal-Almond, Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1002-03 (9th Cir.1996) (analogizing escrow order to preliminary injunction and applying abuse of discretion standard).
discussed Cited "see" SEC v. Yuen
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cal-Almond, Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1002-03 (9th Cir. 1996) (analogizing escrow order to preliminary injunction and applying abuse of discretion stan- dard).
examined Cited "see" Securities and Exchange Commission, Henry C. Yuen Elsie M. Leung, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc. (4×)
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cal-Almond, Inc., 102 F.3d 999, 1001 (9th Cir.1996) (affirming denial of motion to impose escrow).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified School District No. 40 of Pima County, Arizona Whiteriver Unified School District No. 20 of Navajo County Clifford Pablo, Next Best Friend of Clifford Pablo, Jr. Cynthia Parker, Guardian of David Parker Edlina Thompson, Next Best Friend of Nelson Lupe
v.
James Lee Kirk, in His Official Capacity as Treasurer of Pima County, Arizona C. Diane Bishop, in Her Official Capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State of Arizona Anita Lohr, in Her Official Capacity as County School Superintendent for Pima County, Arizona J.R. Despain, in His Official Capacity as Treasurer of Navajo County, Arizona William Bennett, in His Official Capacity as County School Superintendent for Navajo County, Arizona
93-16089.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 18, 1996.
102 F.3d 999
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

102 F.3d 999

INDIAN OASIS-BABOQUIVARI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 40 OF
PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA; Whiteriver Unified School District
No. 20 of Navajo County; Clifford Pablo, next best friend
of Clifford Pablo, Jr.; Cynthia Parker, Guardian of David
Parker; Edlina Thompson, next best friend of Nelson Lupe,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
James Lee KIRK, in his official capacity as Treasurer of
Pima County, Arizona; C. Diane Bishop, in her official
capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction for the
State of Arizona; Anita Lohr, in her official capacity as
County School Superintendent for Pima County, Arizona; J.R.
Despain, in his official capacity as Treasurer of Navajo
County, Arizona; William Bennett, in his official capacity
as County School Superintendent for Navajo County, Arizona,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-16089.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1996.

Prior report: 91 F.3d 1240.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.