Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel, Aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel v. United States, 103 F.3d 137 (9th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel, Aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel v. United States, 103 F.3d 137 (9th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States of America for the use and benefit of John A. Weber Company v. Milcon Construction (hid, 2021-02-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States of America for the use and benefit of John A. Weber Company v. Milcon Construction
D. Haw. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" Robert Segalman v. Southwest Airlines Co.
9th Cir. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adiutori v. Sky Harbor Int’l Airport, 103 F.3d 137 (Table), 1996 WL 673805, at *3 (9th Cir. Nov. 20, 1996).
cited Cited "see" Michelle Gilstrap v. United Air Lines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adiutori v. Sky Harbor Int’l Airport, 103 F.3d 137 (9th Cir.1996) (unpublished), 1996 WL 673805, at *3 .
discussed Cited "see" Cynthia Love v. Delta Air Lines
11th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adiutori v. Sky Harbor Int’l Airport, 103 F.3d 137 (9th Cir.1996) (unpublished table disposition) (“Although [the ACAA] does not expressly provide for’ a private cause of action ..., we are persuaded by the reasoning of other circuits which have held that [it] implies a private right of action ... under the test enunciated in Cort v. Ash ....”).
discussed Cited "see" Waters v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
D.N.J. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adiutori v. Sky Harbor Int'l Airport, No. 95-15774, 103 F.3d 137 , 1996 WL 673805 (9th Cir. Nov.20, 1996); Shinault v. American Airlines, 936 F.2d 796, 800 (5th Cir.1991); Tallarico v. Trans World Airlines, 881 F.2d 566 , 570 (8th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Johnson v. Spearman
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Buck v. Boeing Co., 13 | 103 F.3d 137 (9th Cir. 1996) Ggnorance of rules is insufficient to show good cause to excuse 14 | one’s failure to effect service). 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 34) is denied. 16 Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the defendants named as John Does | - 4 be 17 | dismissed without prejudice. 18 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 19 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)().
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel, Aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel
v.
United States
96-55620.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 6, 1996.
103 F.3d 137
Unpublished

103 F.3d 137

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Oscar Manuel CARRILLO-RANGEL, aka: Oscar Carrillo-Rangel,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-55620.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 2, 1996.[*]
Decided Dec. 06, 1996.

Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM[**]

Oscar Carrillo-Rangel, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) for the return of property administratively forfeited by the government in connection with Carrillo-Rangel's 1991 prosecution for narcotics offenses. Carrillo-Rangel asserts that the administrative forfeiture was invalid because he did not receive the requisite notice pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a) and 21 C.F.R. § 1316.77.

The government concedes that remand is appropriate because on the record before the district court, the notice of forfeiture received by Carrillo-Rangel may have been inadequate. Accordingly, we vacate the denial of the motion for reconsideration and remand for the district court to allow the record to be supplemented with the relevant facts and for the district court to apply the test for adequate notice set forth in Robinson v. Hanrahan, 409 U.S. 38 (1972), and United States v. One 1971 BMW 4-Door Sedan, 652 F.2d 817 (9th Cir.1981).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3