6247 Atlas Corp. v. Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., 104 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
6247 Atlas Corp. v. Threadneedle Ins. Co., Ltd., 104 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“transferee does not act in good faith when he has sufficient knowledge to place him on inquiry notice of the debtor's possible solvency”
73 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners, L.P. (In Re Bayou Group, LLC) (nysb, 2008-10-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners, L.P. (In Re Bayou Group, LLC)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
transferee does not act in good faith when he has sufficient knowledge to place him on inquiry notice of the debtor's possible solvency
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Benbow v. Feely (2×) also: Cited "see"
E.D.N.Y · 2024 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Vasquez, 864 F. Supp. 2d at 239 (“drug prone area”); Sheffield, 104 F.3d at 352 (area “plagued by crime”); but cf. United States v. Scopo, 19 F.3d 777, 782 (2d Cir. 1994) (observing that “the mere presence of a partially concealed firearm is highly and immediately incriminating”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Carwell v. City Of New York (2×) also: Cited "see"
S.D.N.Y. · 2023 · confidence medium
See Norwood, 524 F. App’x at 765 ; Carlisle, 104 F.3d at 352.
discussed Cited "see" Picard v. Legacy Capital Ltd. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
(In re Dreier LLP), 452 B.R. 391, 447 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2011) (collecting cases); see Banner v. Kassow, 104 F.3d 352 , 1996 WL 680760, at *3 (2d Cir. Nov. 22, 1996) (summary order) (“[A] transferee does not act in good faith when he has sufficient knowledge to place him on inquiry notice of the debtor’s possible insolvency.”) (quoting Brown v. Third Nat’l Bank (In re Sherman), 67 F.3d 1348 , 1355 (8th Cir.1995)).
discussed Cited "see" Wimmer Canada, Inc. v. Abele Tractor & Equipment Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Initially, defendant does not challenge the partiality or procedural fairness of the Canadian judicial system (see CPLR 5304 [a] [1]), recognized as “a [sibling] common law jurisdiction with procedures akin to our own” (Clarkson Co., Ltd. v Shaheen, 544 F2d 624, 630 [2d Cir 1976]; see Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Saxony Carpet Co., Inc., 899 F Supp 1248, 1252 , affd 104 F3d 352 ; Lenchyshyn v Pelko Elec., 281 AD2d 42, 46-47 ; Constandinou v Constandinou, 265 AD2d 890 ).
discussed Cited "see" Constandinou v. Constandinou
N.Y. App. Div. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
We reject defendant’s contention that “the [money] judgment was rendered under a system which does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law” (CPLR 5304 [a] [1]; see, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Saxony Carpet Co., 899 F Supp 1248, 1252 , affd 104 F3d 352 ; Clarkson Co. v Shaheen, 544 F2d 624, 629-630).
cited Cited "see" S.C. Chimexim S.A. v. Velco Enterprises Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (denying motion to dismiss).
discussed Cited "see" K & R Robinson Enterprises Ltd. v. Asian Export Material Supply Co.
D. Mass. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Saxony Carpet Co., 899 F.Supp. 1248, 1252 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (“exceptions involving jurisdictional defects or procedural unfairness [should] be construed especially narrowly “when the alien jurisdiction is, like Canada, a sister common law jurisdiction with procedures akin to our own’”), aff'd, 104 F.3d 352 (2d Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Local 875 I.B.T. Pension Fund v. Pollack
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canadian Imperial Bank v. Saxony Carpet Co., 899 F.Supp. 1248, 1253 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (raising issue, of foreign law in opening papers on summary judgment motion was proper notice under Rule 44.1), aff'd., 104 F.3d 352 , 1996 WL 629749 (2d Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see, e.g." LuMee LLC v. Fernandez
Bankr. D. Utah · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Banner v. Kassow, 104 F.3d 352 , at *3 (2d Cir. 1996) (unpublished); In re Anchorage Marina, Inc., 93 B.R. 686, 693 (Bankr.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Toronto-Dominion
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See , e.g. , Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Saxony Carpets Co. , 899 F.Supp. 1248, 1254 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (“Absent a clear showing of fraud, a foreign default judgment is as conclusive an adjudication as a contested judgment.”), aff’d , 104 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 1996). -10- propriety of the Canadian court’s decision to allow substituted service.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Toronto-Dominion Bank
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Saxony Carpets Co., 899 F.Supp. 1248, 1254 (S.D.N.Y.1995) ("Absent a clear showing of fraud, a foreign default judgment is as conclusive an adjudication as a contested judgment."), aff'd, 104 F.3d 352 (2d Cir.1996) 5 It is unclear whether the preclusive effect of the Canadian judgments is to be determined by Utah law or Canadian law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
6247 Atlas Corp. Merchants Bank of New York, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants
v.
Threadneedle Insurance Co., Ltd., a A/c Henry Raymond, an Underwriter at Lloyd's London, on Behalf of Himself and All Those Other Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Policy of Insurance Number 4s/00723/91 Marine Insurance Company, Ltd. The Threadneedle Insurance Co., Ltd. Indemnity Marine Insurance Company, Ltd Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society, Ltd. No. 1 A/c Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd. Sovereign Marine and General Insurance Ltd. Of London Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co. Taisho Marine & Fire Insurance Co., (u.k.) Ltd. Storebrand Insurance Company., (u.k.) Ltd., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, Diacord, Inc. Zedco Kelso Diamond Co. Inc. Josef Chai Corp. Eknam Diamond, Inc. Kothari Gems Sancy Trading N.Y., Inc. Shimon Wernon Dov Fastag, Inc., Also Known as Pavillion, Inc. M & a Diamon Hamid Sedashut Roy Herzl, Inc. D. Navichandra & Co. Isaac Waldman T & T Diamonds Yohai Haim J. Shree Corp. Michael Hezkia Co., Inc. Royal Diamint, Inc. Krisha Gems Solomon Lipshutz Statewide Imports, Inc. Impex Diamond Corp. Occidental Gems Isaac Klein M & a Fancies Co., Inc. Aron Knobloch, Inc. Samet & Shine Diamond Co. Orient Stones & Minerals, Inc. Gordon J. Bares, Inc. Gregric Diamonds E.M. Shoreman Previous Trade, Inc. Diety Gem L.I.D., Israel All-Shape Diamond, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiffs
96-7501.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 31, 1996.
104 F.3d 352

104 F.3d 352

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
6247 ATLAS CORP.; Merchants Bank of New York,
Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants,
v.
THREADNEEDLE INSURANCE CO., LTD., A A/C; Henry Raymond, An
Underwriter at Lloyd's London, on behalf of himself and all
those other Lloyd's Underwriters subscribing to policy of
Insurance Number 4S/00723/91; Marine Insurance Company,
Ltd.; the Threadneedle Insurance Co., Ltd.; Indemnity
Marine Insurance Company, Ltd; Norwich Union Fire Insurance
Society, Ltd. No. 1 A/C; Norwich Union Fire Insurance
Society Ltd.; Sovereign Marine and General Insurance Ltd.
of London; Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co.; Taisho
Marine & Fire Insurance Co., (U.K.) Ltd.; Storebrand
Insurance Company., (U.K.) Ltd., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees,
DIACORD, INC.; Zedco; Kelso Diamond Co. Inc.; Josef Chai
Corp.; Eknam Diamond, Inc.; Kothari Gems; Sancy Trading
N.Y., Inc.; Shimon Wernon; Dov Fastag, Inc., also known as
Pavillion, Inc.; M & A Diamon; Hamid Sedashut; Roy Herzl,
Inc.; D. Navichandra & Co.; Isaac Waldman; T & T
Diamonds; Yohai Haim; J. Shree Corp.; Michael Hezkia Co.,
Inc.; Royal Diamint, Inc.; Krisha Gems; Solomon Lipshutz;
Statewide Imports, Inc.; Impex Diamond Corp.; Occidental
Gems; Isaac Klein; M & A Fancies Co., Inc.; Aron
Knobloch, Inc.; Samet & Shine Diamond Co.; Orient Stones &
Minerals, Inc.; Gordon J. Bares, Inc.; Gregric Diamonds;
E.M. Shoreman; Previous Trade, Inc.; Diety Gem; L.I.D.,
Israel; All-Shape Diamond, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiffs.

No. 96-7501.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1996.

APPEARING FOR APPELLANTS: Edward A. Keane, Mahoney & Keane, New York, New York.

APPEARING FOR APPELLEES: Daniel J. Friedman, Abrams & Martin, P.C., New York, New York.

Before LUMBARD, OAKES and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

1

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and was argued by counsel.

2

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

3

1. Plaintiffs-appellants 6247 Atlas Corp. ("Atlas") and the Merchants Bank of New York ("Merchants") appeal from a judgment entered March 26, 1996 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that granted summary judgment dismissing their complaint. Plaintiffs-appellants seek in this action to recover under applicable insurance policies for a burglary committed against Atlas, a Manhattan dealer in precious stones, metals, and jewelry. Merchants, a secured creditor of Atlas, is a "loss payee" under Atlas' insurance policies. The district court ruled that under New York law, which applies in this diversity case, plaintiffs-appellants were barred from recovery by Atlas' failure to comply with a provision of its insurance policies that required it to "keep detailed records of all sales, purchases and other transactions."

4

2. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court. See 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine Ins. Co., 923 F.Supp. 523 (S.D.N.Y.1996). Merchants presents on appeal, however, one argument that is not addressed in the district court's opinion. Merchants argues that language in the "loss payee" clause stating that "loss shall be payable as interest shall be" to Merchants renders Merchants a separate insured under the contract, and that Atlas' breach therefore does not preclude Merchants' recovery under the policy. This position was rejected in Wometco Home Theatre, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co., 97 A.D.2d 715, 716, 468 N.Y.S.2d 625, 626 (1st Dep't 1983) (mem.), aff'd, 62 N.Y.2d 614, 476 N.Y.S.2d 116 (1984) (affirming "for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division"). The Appellate Division ruled in Wometco that "[i]n the absence of a provision that the insurance policy shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the insured, a 'loss payee' is not itself an insured under the policy; it is merely the designated person to whom the loss is to be paid." Id. (citation omitted); see also Ressler v. White, 968 F.2d 1478, 1479 (2d Cir.1992) (per curiam). A loss payee stands in the place of the insured, and, absent an express provision to the contrary, cannot recover under the policy if the insured could not have recovered. See Ressler, 968 F.2d at 1479-80 (collecting cases); Wometco, 97 A.D.2d at 716, 468 N.Y.S.2d at 626 (collecting cases.)