Hershel Fleming, Hon. Wolodymyr Cybriwsky, Attorney-Appellant v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 110 F.3d 63 (6th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Hershel Fleming, Hon. Wolodymyr Cybriwsky, Attorney-Appellant v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 110 F.3d 63 (6th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hanna v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (tnmd, 2021-09-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hanna v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
M.D. Tenn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutzback, 233 F. Supp. 3d at 628 (“‘Equitable tolling is an extraordinary remedy that is sparingly applied and concerns cases involving extraordinary circumstances.’”) (quoting Bennett v. Runyon, No. 96–5532, 110 F.3d 63 , 1997 WL 133337, at *1 (Mar. 21, 1997).
discussed Cited "see" Malam v. Rebecca Adducci
E.D. Mich. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carney v. Sundquist, 110 F.3d 63, 63 (6th Cir. 1997) (table decision) (concluding that prisoner’s excessive detention lawsuit “is appropriately characterized as a hybrid habeas corpus/civil rights action”).
cited Cited "see" Martin v. Jones
M.D. Tenn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garfinkle v. Huff, 110 F.3d 63 (Table), 1997 WL 144212 (6th Cir. Mar. 27, 1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hershel Fleming, Hon. Wolodymyr Cybriwsky, Attorney-Appellant
v.
Commissioner of Social Security
96-5608.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Mar 26, 1997.
110 F.3d 63
Unpublished

110 F.3d 63

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Hershel FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Hon. Wolodymyr Cybriwsky, Attorney-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-5608.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 26, 1997.

Before: KEITH, MERRITT and COLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.