green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McClintock, Bradley Ray
See Caballes, 543 U.S. at 409, 410 , 125 S. Ct. at 838 (use of “well-trained narcotics-detection dog” during traffic stop does not violate Fourth Amendment); Tarazon-Silva, 166 F.3d at 341 (dog sniff of garage and vent on exterior of house not search under Fourth Amendment); Williams, 69 F.3d at 28 (positive dog alert creates probable cause to search vehicle); Romo, 315 S.W.3d at 573 (dog sniff of garage door and backyard fence not search under Fourth Amendment); Rodriguez, 106 S.W.3d at 228–29 (dog sniff at front door of house not search); Porter, 93 S.W.3d at 346–47 (same).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bradley Ray McClintock v. State
(2×)
See Caballes, 543 U.S. at 409, 410 , 125 S.Ct. at 838 (use of “well-trained narcotics-detection dog” during traffic stop does not violate Fourth Amendment); Tarazon-Silva, 166 F.3d at 341 (dog sniff of garage and vent on exterior of house not search under Fourth Amendment); Williams, 69 F.3d at 28 (positive dog alert creates probable cause to search vehicle); Romo, 315 S.W.3d at 573 (dog sniff of garage door and backyard fence not search under Fourth Amendment); Rodriguez, 106 S.W.3d at 228-29 (dog sniff at front door of house not search); Porter, 93 S.W.3d at 346-47 (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. United States
See United States v. Tarazon-Silva, 166 F.3d 341 , -, 1998 WL 912178 at *1 (5th Cir.1998) (unpublished).
cited
Cited "see"
HENRY BOYD, JR v. U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON
See Boyd v. Barkley, 166 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Jackson
Likewise, “when a prisoner has no liberty interest in obtaining parole … he cannot complain of the constitutionality of procedural devices attendant to parole decisions.” Wansley, 769 F.3d at 312–13 (citation omitted); see also Cotton v. Booker, 166 F.3d 341, *1 (5th Cir. 1998) (unpub.) (“Because Cotton has no liberty interest in obtaining parole in Mississippi, he cannot complain of the denial of parole based on his allegations of a denial of due process, abuse of discretion, or consideration of false or improper factors.”) Indeed, “[t]here is no constitutional or inherent right…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Porter v. State
See also United States v. Tarazon-Silva, 960 F.Supp. 1152, 1162-63 (W.D.Tex.1997) (holding that dog sniff of dryer vent of house was not a search), aff'd, 166 F.3d 341 (5th Cir.1998); People v. Dunn, 77 N.Y.2d 19 , 563 N.Y.S.2d 388 , 564 N.E.2d 1054, 1056-57 (1990) (holding that canine sniff outside an apartment was not a search), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1219 , 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daille
v.
Johnson[*]
NO. 96-41276
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
December 17, 1998
Appeal From: E.D.Tex. , No.6:96-CV-603
1
Affirmed.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2