green
Positive treatment
12.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Rico Williams
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
In other words, he lives there because of his connection to the military rather than because of other significant “local ties.” Daneshpayeh v. Dep’t of Air Force, 17 F.3d 1444, at *2 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Denise Saunders v. Department of the Treasury
See Daneshpayeh v. Department of the Air Force, 57 M.S.P.R. 672 , 682 n.9 (1993) (stating that the Board lacks jurisdiction over allegations of harmful error absent an otherwise appealable action), aff’d, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Mazen Khenaisser v. Department of the Interior
See Farmer v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Schmitt v. Department of Energy
See Daneshpayeh v. Department of the Air Force, 57 M.S.P.R. 672 , 682 n.9 (1993) (finding that the Board could not consider the appellant’s harmful error claims because it lacked jurisdiction over his appeal), aff’d, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mr. Ronald Zimmerman v. Department of Defense
See Daneshpayeh v. Department of the Air Force, 57 M.S.P.R. 672 , 682 n.9 (1993) (the Board lacks jurisdiction over allegations of harmful error absent an otherwise appealable action), aff’d, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Research & Development Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.
(2×)
See generally National Research Development Corporation v. Vanan Associates, 822 F.Supp. 1121, 1121-24 (D.N.J.1993) (discussing NMR spectrometry and the Hoult patent), af fd in part, vacated in part, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.Cir.1994) (Table) (text in Westlaw at 1994 WL 18963 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wardlaw Farms, Inc. v. United States
See Simons v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 685, 687 (1992), affd, 17 F.3d 1444 (Fed.Cir.1994) (table); Doty v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 615, 624-26 (1991); see also, Ryder Farms, Inc. v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 278, 282 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
River Equipment Company, Inc.
v.
John Shannon, Acting Secretary of the Army
v.
John Shannon, Acting Secretary of the Army
93-1379.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 27, 1994.
Published
17 F.3d 1444
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
RIVER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Appellant,
v.
John SHANNON, Acting Secretary of the Army, Appellee.
No. 93-1379.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 27, 1994.
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.
*
Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation