Augustin Perez v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., William Monk, John Doe, U.S. Dep't of Just., 176 F.3d 472 (3rd Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Augustin Perez v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., William Monk, John Doe, U.S. Dep't of Just., 176 F.3d 472 (3rd Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“they are in reality suits against the united states since any judgment would be paid out of the united states treasury.”
52 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: COHEN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (njd, 2020-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) COHEN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
D.N.J. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
they are in reality suits against the united states since any judgment would be paid out of the united states treasury.
cited Cited "see" Jackson v. United States Attorneys Office, District of New Jersey
D.D.C. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. The Right Stuff, et al., 176 F.3d 472 (3rd Cir.1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McDonald v. Davis
D.V.I. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Oct. 24, 2007) (citations omitted); see also Int’l Islamic Cmty. of Masjid Baytulkhaliq, Inc. v. United States, 37 V.I. 287 , 981 F. Supp. 352, 369 (D.V.I. 1997) (“It is not enough that the defendant acted with tortious intent or even that he acted with malice.”), aff’d, 176 F.3d 472 (3d Cir. 1999). “[I]t is extremely rare to find conduct in the employment context that will rise to the level of outrageousness necessary to provide a basis for recovery for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress.” McGreevy v. Stroup, 413 F.3d 359, 370 (3d Cir. 2005) (quotation marks …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. Ragster
D.V.I. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Oct. 24, 2007) (citations omitted); see also Int’l Islamic Cmty. of Masjid Baytulkhaliq, Inc. v. United States, 981 F. Supp. 352, 369 , 37 V.I. 287 (D.V.I. 1997) (“It is not enough that the defendant acted with tortious intent or even that he acted with malice.”), aff’d, 176 F.3d 472 (3d Cir. 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Augustin Perez
v.
U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, William Monk, John Doe, U.S. Department of Justice
98-7107.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 15, 1999.
176 F.3d 472
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)

176 F.3d 472

Augustin Perez
v.
U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, William Monk,
John Doe, U.S. Department of Justice

NO. 98-7107

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

January 15, 1999

1

Appeal From: D.V.I.

2

Affirmed.