United States v. Paul Stoner, 19 F.3d 1435 (6th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Paul Stoner, 19 F.3d 1435 (6th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Donahoo v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services (ohnd, 2002-03-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Donahoo v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services
N.D. Ohio · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanhoose v. O’Dea, 19 F.3d 1435 , 1994 WL 102959, *1 , No. 93-6399 (6th Cir. March 25, 1994), unpublished.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Paul Stoner
93-1773.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Mar 9, 1994.
19 F.3d 1435
Unpublished

19 F.3d 1435

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Paul STONER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-1773.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 9, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; and GUY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.