green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“the plaintiff's cryptic conspiracy allegation ... omitted essential allegations detailing an agreement to jointly undertake specific actions illegalized by rico.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Huang v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
the plaintiff's cryptic conspiracy allegation ... omitted essential allegations detailing an agreement to jointly undertake specific actions illegalized by rico.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Birda Trollinger Robert Martinez Tabetha Eddings and Doris Jewell v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
See Holmes, 503 U.S. at 270-74 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 (SIPC-customers-brokers-tortfeasor); Perry, 324 F.3d at 849 (policy holders-insurance company-smokers-tortfeasors); Pik-Coal Co., 200 F.3d at 890-91 (coal broker-coal company-tortfeasor); Firestone, 976 F.2d at 285 (benefíciaries-estate-tortfea-sors); Sanders Confectionery Prods., Inc., 973 F.2d at 487 (stockholder-corporation-tortfeasor).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Trollinger v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Id. at 268-69 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 ; Pik-Coal Co., 200 F.3d at 889-91; Firestone v. Galbreath, 976 F.2d 279, 285 (6th Cir. 1992); Sanders Confectionery Prods., Inc. v. Heller Fin., Inc., 973 F.2d 474, 487 (6th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Paycom Billing Services, Inc. v. Payment Resources International
See Pik-Coal Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp., 200 F.3d 884, 891 (6th Cir.2000); VanDen-Broeck v. Commonpoint Mortgage Co., 22 F.Supp.2d 677, 691 (W.D.Mich.1998), aff'd, 210 F.3d 696 (6th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tennessee Medical Ass'n v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.
At common law, “a plaintiff who complained of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person by the defendant’s acts was generally said to stand at too remote a distance to recover.” Holmes, 503 U.S. at 268-69 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 ; see also Pik-Coal Co., 200 F.3d at 889.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry v. American Tobacco Co.
At common law, “a plaintiff who complained of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person by the defendant’s acts was generally said to stand at too remote a distance to recover.” Holmes, 503 U.S. at 268-69 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 ; see also Pik-Coal Co., 200 F.3d at 889.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry v. the American Tobacco Company, Inc.
At common law, "a plaintiff who complained of harm flowing merely from the misfortunes visited upon a third person by the defendant's acts was generally said to stand at too remote a distance to recover." Holmes , 503 U.S. at 268-69 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 ; see also Pik-Coal Co., 200 F.3d at 889. 5 The district court dismissed Plaintiffs' claims because they failed to satisfy this proximate cause requirement.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles FREEMAN; Rosalyn Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
97-10907.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 10, 2000.
Laura Beth Beshara (argued), Michael M. Daniel, Dallas, TX, for Freeman and Brown., William Kent Mcllyar (argued), Walter Columbus Davis, III, Dallas, TX, for City of Dallas., Andrea Joan Capps Douglas, Houston, TX, for City of Houston, Amicus Curiae., (Opinion August 18, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, 186 F.3d 601)
King, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss, Benavides, Stewart, Parker, Dennis.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Kentucky (1)
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.
The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.