green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
11.4 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 4 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 · 2 courts ·
…f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marrs v. Tuckey
f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Floyd Bruce
(2×)
f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bruce
f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire no. 03-3110 united states v. bruce page 6 to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael A. Robinson
f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Robinson
f the intent of the private party conducting the search is independent of the official desire to collect evidence in a criminal proceeding, then the private party is not acting as a state agent.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Smythe, Cramer Co.
while technical rules of pleading existed for defamation at common law, the liberalized requirements of the federal rules only require 'notice pleading.
cited
Cited "see"
Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc.
See Suarez Corp. v. CBS, Inc., 23 F.3d 408 (Table), at *4 (6th Cir. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johansen v. HomeAdvisor, Inc.
See generally Suarez Corp. v. CBS, Inc., 23 F.3d 408 , 1994 WL 142785, at *2-5 (6th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision) (recognizing that personal jurisdiction may be imputed from an agent’s contacts with the forum state).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nicole Schneyder v. Gina Smith
See Stone v. Holzberger, 23 F.3d 408 (6th Cir.1994) (unpublished) (requiring that a detained material witness be afforded a probable cause hearing without discussing what should be assessed at such a hearing); White v. Gerbitz, 892 F.2d 457, 460-61 (6th Cir.1989) (concluding that a material witness’s arrest "was supported by probable cause” without considering the term’s applicability); Bacon v. United States, 449 F.2d 933, 942 (9th Cir.1971) (stating uncritically that a material witness’s "arrest and detention must be based on probable cause”).
cited
Cited "see"
Mahler v. Startari
See Suarez Corp. v. CBS, Inc., 23 F.3d 408 , 1994 WL 142785, at *4 (6th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (table).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Crowder
See United States v. Denne, 23 F.3d 408 , 1994 WL 162606, at *2 (6th Cir. April 29, 1994) (unpublished).
cited
Cited "see"
Mayes v. City of Columbus
See Toney v. Davis (C.A.6, 1994), 23 F.3d 408 , citing Dunn v. Tennessee (C.A.6, 1982), 697 F.2d 121, 125 , certiorari denied (1983), 460 U.S. 1086 , 103 S.Ct. 1778 , 76 L.Ed.2d 349 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Lawrence Dionne Evans, Anthony R. Boone
v.
Lawrence Dionne Evans, Anthony R. Boone
93-1952.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 28, 1994.
Published
23 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lawrence Dionne EVANS, Anthony R. Boone, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 93-1952, 93-2060.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 28, 1994.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; MILBURN and SILER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
2
The court finds that no error, or harmless error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.