green
Positive treatment
19.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC
Cir. 2008) (quoting FPL Energy Main Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kindred Healthcare, Inc. v. Azar
Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mercy General Hospital v. Burwell
Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Turlock Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
This evidence of weekly trips is more substantial than the evidence of boating we found sufficient in FPL Energy. 287 F.3d at 1159 (concluding that “[three] test canoe trips provide sufficient evidence that the Stream is navigable”); see also Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 185 F.2d 491, 493-94 (D.C.Cir.1950) (concluding that use of the river by “several steamboats” was sufficient to support a navigability finding).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 2, Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, Afl-Cio
Hydro LLC, 287 F.3d at 1160.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Toms v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
Hydro, LLC v. F.E.R.C., 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002)). 14 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Toms v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
Hydro, LLC v. F.E.R.C., 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the Interior
(2×)
FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
This deferential standard of review “requires more than a scintilla, but can be satisfied by something less than a preponderance of the evidence.” FPL Energy Main Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
II We need not linger long over Columbia’s petition for review because FERC’s rejection of the force majeure defense was easily supported by “substantial evidence.” “The ‘substantial evidence’ standard requires more than a scintilla, but can be satisfied by something less than a preponderance of the evidence.” FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
James M. Knott, Sr. Riverdale Power & Electric Co., Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
FPL, 287 F.3d at 1156.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ware v. Barnhart
Edison, 305 U.S. at 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , is satisfied by “something less than a preponderance of the evidence.” FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stand Up for California! v. United States Department of the Interior
See FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151, 1160 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burt v. Winter
Agency findings of fact are reviewed for "substantial evidence.” JSG Trading Corp. v. Dep’t of Agric., 235 F.3d 608, 611 (D.C.Cir. 2001) (substantial evidence is "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion when taking into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 287 F.3d 1151 , *391 1160 (D.C.Cir.2002) ("The 'substantial evidence’ standard requires more than a scintilla, but can be satisfied by something less than a preponderance of…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FPL Engy ME Hydro
v.
FERC
v.
FERC
99-1397.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 7, 2002.
287 F.3d 1151
Published
United States Court of Appeals
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 99-1397 September Term, 2001 Filed On: May 3, 2002 [675504] FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC, Petitioner
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Respondent
American Rivers, et al.,
Intervenors
On Petition for Review of Orders of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Before: Sentelle, Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ordered by the Court, sua sponte, that the opinion in the above case filed this date be, and it hereby is, amended accordingly:
Page 3, lines 4 and 10, "16 U.S.C. 976(8)" should read "16 U.S.C. 796(8)."
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 99-1397 September Term, 2001 Filed On: May 3, 2002 [675504] FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC, Petitioner
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Respondent
American Rivers, et al.,
Intervenors
On Petition for Review of Orders of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Before: Sentelle, Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ordered by the Court, sua sponte, that the opinion in the above case filed this date be, and it hereby is, amended accordingly:
Page 3, lines 4 and 10, "16 U.S.C. 976(8)" should read "16 U.S.C. 796(8)."
Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
Deputy Clerk