green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority
See Jackson & Coker, Inc. v. Lynam, 840 F.Supp. 1040, 1050 (E.D.Pa.1993), aff'd, 31 F.3d 1172 (3d Cir. 1994) (finding that the issue of emotional distress was one “easily understood by the jury,” and that the jury, in awarding no damages for emotional distress, may simply have disbelieved the plaintiffs uncorroborated evidence on the issue). 12 Additionally, we reject Mason’s contention that the verdict form was “sufficiently confusing to the jurors as to cause them to neglect to consider any award to Mason for his nonpecuniary loses [sic].” Appellee’s/Cross-Appellant’s Br. at 18…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority
See Jackson & Coker, Inc. v. Lynam, 840 F.Supp. 1040, 1050 (E.D.Pa.1993), aff'd, 31 F.3d 1172 (3d Cir.1994) (finding that the issue of emotional distress was one "easily understood by the jury," and that the jury, in awarding no damages for emotional distress, may simply have disbelieved the plaintiff's uncorroborated evidence on the issue). 12 76 Additionally, we reject Mason's contention that the verdict form was "sufficiently confusing to the jurors as to cause them to neglect to consider any award to Mason for his nonpecuniary loses [sic]." Appellee's/Cross-Appellant's Br. at 18.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Naccarato (Frank G.)
v.
Burlington Air Express
v.
Burlington Air Express
93-3606.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jul 18, 1994.
Published
Naccarato (Frank G.)
v.
Burlington Air Express
NO. 93-3606
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
July 18, 1994
Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,
McCune, J.
1
AFFIRMED.