Theodore Lewis v. L. Faulk, Captain, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Theodore Lewis v. L. Faulk, Captain, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Kramer (vaeb, 2011-09-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" In re Kramer
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" In Re James
Bankr. E.D.N.C. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53 (E.D.Va.1993), affd, In re Grablowsky, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished opinion).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Bell
Bankr. E.D. Wis. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd sub nom Ainslie v. Grablowsky, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994); In re Hyman, 123 B.R. 342, 348 (9th Cir. BAP 1991), aff'd 967 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir.1992); In re Page, 171 B.R. 349 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1994); In re Mercer, 158 B.R. 886 (Bankr.D.R.I.1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Saunders
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53, 57-8 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994); Pope v. Clark (In re Clark), 274 B.R. 127, 133 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.2002); In re Bregni, 215 B.R. 850, 852-53 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1997); In re Heflin, 215 B.R. 530, 535 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1997); In re DeSoto, 181 B.R. 704, 710 (Bankr.D.Conn.1995); In re Shoemaker, 155 B.R. 552, 555 (Bankr.N.D.Ala.1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hovis v. Wiggins (In Re Wiggins)
Bankr. D.S.C. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53, 59-60 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994); Seror, 28 F.3d at 82; In re Sherbahn, 170 B.R. 137, 139-40 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1994); Ainslie v. Grablowsky (In re Grablowsky), 149 B.R. 402, 405-06 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1993).
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re Heater
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53, 56-57 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd. by In re Grablowsky, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert A. Mercer, Jr., Debtor v. Jason Monzack, Esquire
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Addison v. Reavis, 158 B.R. 53, 59-60 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd, 32 F.3d 562 (4th Cir.1994); Seror, 28 F.3d at 82 ; In re Sherbahn, 170 B.R. 137, 139-40 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1994); Ainslie v. Grablowsky (In re Grablowsky), 149 B.R. 402, 405-06 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1993).
Theodore Lewis
v.
L. Faulk, Captain
94-6581.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 15, 1994.
32 F.3d 562
Unpublished

32 F.3d 562

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Theodore LEWIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
L. FAULK, Captain, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6581.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 15, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-320)

Theodore Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Kevin Lawson Keller, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Lewis v. Faulk, No. CA-93-320 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED