Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington N. & Sante Fe Ry. Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 321 F.3d 1203 (6th Cir. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington N. & Sante Fe Ry. Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 321 F.3d 1203 (6th Cir. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Castellano v. Fragozo (ca5, 2003-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Castellano v. Fragozo
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castellano v. Fragozo, 311 F.3d 689, 712 (5th Cir. 2002) (Barksdale, J., dissenting), vacated by 321 F.3d 1203 (5th Cir. 2003); Kerr v. Lyford, 171 F.3d 330, 342 (5th Cir. 1999) (Jones, J., concurring).
discussed Cited "see" Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.
D.C. Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., 310 F.3d 443, 452 (6th Cir.2002) (reinstatement that “puts the plaintiff in the same position she would have been in absent the suspension constitutes the ‘ultimate employment decision,’ thereby negating a potentially adverse intermediate employment decision”), reh’g en banc granted and judgment vacated, 321 F.3d 1203 (2003); Pennington v. City of Huntsville, 261 F.3d 1262 , 1267-68 (11th Cir.2001) (no adverse employment action where plaintiff initially denied but shortly thereafter received promotion); Brooks v. *1242 San Mate…
discussed Cited "see" Castellano v. Fragozo
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castellano v. Fragozo, 311 F.3d 689, 712 (5th Cir.2002) (Barksdale, J., dissenting), vacated by 321 F.3d 1203 (5th Cir.2003); Kerr v. Lyford, 171 F.3d 330, 342 (5th Cir.1999) (Jones, J., concurring).
discussed Cited "see" Castellano v. Fragozo
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castellano v. Fragozo, 311 F.3d 689, 712 (5th Cir.2002) (Barksdale, J., dissenting), vacated by 321 F.3d 1203 (5th Cir.2003); Kerr v. Lyford, 171 F.3d 330, 342 (5th Cir.1999) (Jones, J., concurring).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant
v.
Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
01-5024.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 11, 2003.
321 F.3d 1203
Published

321 F.3d 1203

Sheila WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTE FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

No. 00-6780.

No. 01-5024.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 11, 2003.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

2

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and the cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

4

It is further ORDERED that the appellant cross-appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Thursday, March 13, 2003 and the appellee cross-appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, April 14, 2003.

5

The Clerk will schedule these cases for oral argument as directed by the Court.