green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Keith M. Phillips
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 388 (1993) (“[P]ublic officials are presumed to have properly discharged their official duties.”), aff’d, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nassau River Stone, LLC, GH Manager, LLC, Tax Matters Partner
It remains a well-settled rule that “all necessary prerequisites to the validity of official action are presumed to be complied with.” Ibid. (quoting Lewis v. United States, 279 U.S. 63, 73 (1929)); see Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 388 (1993) (holding that IRS officials “are presumed to have properly dis- charged their official duties”), aff’d, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Long Branch Land, LLC, Big Escambia Ventures, LLC, Tax Matters Partner
Indeed, “[i]t is the settled general rule that all necessary prerequisites to the validity of official action are presumed to have been complied with.” Lewis v. United States, 279 U.S. 63, 73 (1929); see Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 388 (1993) (holding that IRS officials “are presumed to have properly discharged their offi- cial duties”), aff’d, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994). 3 Petitioner cites Timberland Paving & Construction Co. v. United States, 8 Cl.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chai v. Comm'r
(2×)
See Mecom v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 374 , 384 (1993) , affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) ; see also Horn v. Commissioner , T.C.
cited
Cited "see"
American Home Assurance Co. v. Cat Tech, L.L.C.
See Massey, 40 F.3d 385 , 1994 WL 652520, at *2-3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Whalen v. Comm'r
See Mecom v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 374 , 382 (1993) , affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) .
cited
Cited "see"
Robnett v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374 , 386 (1993) , affd. 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Barber v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374 , 386 (1993) , *483 affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Pollack v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 92 , 108 (1966) , affd. 392 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1968) ; Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. 1158 , 1165 (1946) , affd. 162 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947) .
cited
Cited "see"
Rhone Poulenc Surfactants and Specialties, L.P. v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 384 (1993), affd. 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schalekamp v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374 , 382-383 (1993) , *288 affd. without published opinion, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Amesbury Apartments, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 227 , 240-241 (1990) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Singer v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 374 , 386 (1993) , affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Pollack v. Commissioner , 47 T.C. 92 , 108 (1966) , affd. 392 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1968) ; Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. Commissioner , 6 T.C. 1158 , 1165 (1946) , affd. 162 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947) ; Sacks v. Commissioner , T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Greene v. Commissioner
See Mecom v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 374 , 386 (1993) , affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) ; Pollack v. Commissioner , 47 T.C. 92 , 108 (1966) , affd. 392 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1968) ; *380 Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. Commissioner , 6 T.C. 1158 , 1165 (1946) , affd. 162 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947) ; Sacks v. Commissioner , T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
GALE
(2×)
See Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374 , 384 (1993) , affd. 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clair R. Couturier, Jr.
See, e.g., Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 382 (1993) (collecting authorities and holding that “[t]he bar of the statutory period of limitation is an affirmative defense” and that once the taxpayer “has established a prima facie case that the statutory pe- riod of limitation precludes [the Commissioner] from making any assess- ment . . . the burden of going forward shifts to [the Commissioner]”), aff’d, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision); see also Michael I.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cory H. Smith
See, e.g., Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374, 388 (1993) (concluding that an official had authority to sign a consent to extend the limitations period when officials with the same title regularly executed such agreements and noting that “public officials are presumed to have properly discharged their official duties”), aff’d, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994); Perlmutter v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 382, 399 (1965) (“[W]e must start with the premise that ‘Acts done by a public officer “which presuppose the existence of other acts to make them legally operative, are presumptive proofs of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grossman v. United States
(CCH) at 1494 (same holding as to revenue agent signing extension of statute of limitations, despite non-delegation provision in Delegation Order 42 (Rev.6), 1975- 1 C.B. 635 ); see also Mecom v. Comm’r, 101 T.C. 374, 390 , 1993 WL 444600 (1993), aff'd, 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir.1994) (table) (rejecting similar argument as to extension of statute of limitations, stating that "a person acting in a temporary position assumes and possesses all the authority vested in, or delegated to, that position”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weiss v. Commissioner
Memo 1989-516 ; see also Mecom v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 374 , 392 (1993) ("'A deal is after all a deal, and fairness dictates that both parties adhere to the provisions of the document they both voluntarily signed.'" (quoting Grunwald v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 85 , 89 (1986))) , affd. without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994) . 6 ADDITION TO TAX AND INCREASED INTEREST Section 6653(a) imposes additions to tax where the taxpayer *49 has acted negligently or with intentional disregard of rules and regulations.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Matter of Global Fitness
93-01727.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 9, 1994.
Published
In Matter of Global Fitness[*]
NO. 93-01727
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov 09, 1994
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:93-59-M
1
DISMISSED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2