United States v. Hammoud, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Hammoud, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Mohamad Hammoud (ca4, 2012-06-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" United States v. Mohamad Hammoud (3×)
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th *867 Cir.2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Campa (2×)
11th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 , 333 n. 6 (en banc) (4th Cir.2004), vacated and remanded, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 , opinion reinstated in part, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir.2005).
discussed Cited "see" Bouygues Telecom, S.A. v. Tekelec
E.D.N.C. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316, 337 (4th Cir.2004), vacated, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005), opinion reinstated in relevant part, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir.2005) (holding that where work was subjected to peer review, terrorism expert could rely on comparison of information against relevant experience, due to absence of a formal methodology).
discussed Cited "see" Bruce v. United States
M.D. Penn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bruce, 396 F.3d 697 (6th Cir.2005), vacated in part, 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 126 S.Ct. 466 , 163 L.Ed.2d 354 (2005). 3 On August 13, 2004, while incarcerated on the bank fraud con *367 viction at FCI Fort Dix, New Jersey, Defendant signed a sworn statement regarding his “right to remain legally in the United States and [his] present status in the United States.” (Gov.’s Ex. 13.) This statement, provided to a BICE officer, consists of handwritten responses to questions that had been typed on the form.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Woods
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bruce, 396 F.3d 697, 720 (6th Cir.2005), vacated, 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir. 2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Assi
E.D. Mich. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hammond, 381 F.3d 316, 328-29 (4th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005), reinstated in relevant part, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir.2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Woods
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bruce, 396 F.3d 697, 720 (6th Cir.2005), vacated, 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir.2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Simons, Chester
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bruce, 396 F.3d 697, 720 (6th Cir.2005), vacated in part, 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir. 2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Trevino
W.D. Mich. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. ; see also United States v. Bruce , 396 F.3d 697 , 709 (6th Cir. 2005) (concluding that hotel occupants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in items placed in trash where they would have been picked up during the routine daily cleaning of hotel room) vacated in part on rehr'g on unrelated grounds , 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir. 2005) (mem. op.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Elshinawy
D. Maryland · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hammond, 381 F. 3d 316 , 327 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1097 , 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005), reinstated in part, 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir. 2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Fawzi Assi
6th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
LAW AND ANALYSIS The Terrorism Enhancement, § 3A1.4, only applies to violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B where the evidence shows that the defendant provided support to a foreign terrorist organization with the intent “to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct.” 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(A); see also United States v. Hammond, 381 F.3d 316 , 356 (4th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds by 543 *573 U.S. 1097, 125 S.Ct. 1051 , 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005), relevant portions reinstated by 405 F.3d 1034 (4th Cir.2005) (“[A]…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mohamad Youssef Hammoud, A/K/A Ali Abousaleh, A/K/A Ali Albousaleh, Center for Constitutional Rights National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers National Lawyers Guild, Amici Supporting
03-4253.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 27, 2005.
405 F.3d 1034
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

405 F.3d 1034

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mohamad Youssef HAMMOUD, a/k/a Ali Abousaleh, a/k/a Ali Albousaleh, Defendant-Appellant,
Center for Constitutional Rights; National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; National Lawyers Guild, Amici Supporting Appellant.

No. 03-4253.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 27, 2005.

1

Douglas Scott Broyles, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Kenneth Davis Bell, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Charlotte, NC, Demetra Daniel Lambros, John F. DePue, Anthony Steven Murry, Martha Rubio, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

2

James Patrick McLoughlin, Jr., James William Haldin, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, NC, Stanley Lewis Cohen, New York, NY, for Defendant — Appellant.

3

Nancy Chang, Shayana Devendra Kadidal, Center for Constitutional Rights, New York, NY, David Douglas Cole, Washington, DC, for Amici Supporting Appellant.

ORDER

4

This court, sitting en banc, previously affirmed Mohamad Youssef Hammoud's convictions and sentence. See United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc). Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our decision, and remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See Hammoud v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1051, 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005).

5

Because the order of the Supreme Court does not affect our resolution of Hammoud's challenges to his convictions and the calculation of his guideline range, we reinstate those portions of our prior opinion. See Hammoud, 381 F.3d at 325-44, 354-57. However, the sentence imposed on Hammoud exceeded the maximum sentence authorized by the jury verdict alone, see United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 542 (4th Cir.2005), and the Government cannot prove that this error, which Hammoud preserved in the district court, did not affect Hammoud's substantial rights, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a). We therefore vacate Hammoud's sentence and remand for resentencing under the advisory guidelines regime set forth in Booker, 125 S.Ct. at 756-57, 764-65.

6

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkins with the concurrences of Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Williams, Michael, Motz, Traxler, King, Gregory, Shedd, and Duncan.