Roy E. Langston v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Roy E. Langston v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael Tye v. Office of Personnel Management (mspb, 2024-07-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Michael Tye v. Office of Personnel Management
MSPB · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See McLaughlin v. Office of Personnel Management, 62 M.S.P.R. 536 , 554-55 (1994) (declining to consider an appellant’s hypothetical scenarios that would require the Board to issue an advisory opinion, which is specifically forbidden by statute), aff’d per curiam, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Rommie Requena v. Department of Homeland Security
MSPB · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
I-2 AF, Tab 2 at 1; I-3 AF, Tab 4 at 1; Requena v. Department of Homeland Security, MSPB Docket No. DA-1221-16-0488-W-2, Appeal File, Tab 2 at 1; Requena v. Department of Homeland Security, MSPB Docket No. DA- 1221-16-0488-W-3, Appeal File, Tab 4 at 1; see McLaughlin v. Office of Personnel Management, 62 M.S.P.R. 536 , 549 (1994) (noting that the administrative judge incorporated the record from previous Board appeals of the appellant into the record of the current appeal), aff’d, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" John Doe v. Department of the Navy
MSPB · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harmon v. General Services Administration, 61 M.S.P.R. 327 , 329, 334-35 (1994) (finding nexus where an employee falsified his application materials years earlier), aff’d, 47 F.3d 1181 (Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roy E. Langston
v.
Department of Veterans Affairs
94-3468.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 12, 1995.
47 F.3d 1181
Unpublished

47 F.3d 1181

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Roy E. LANGSTON, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 94-3468

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 12, 1995.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.