Emmett J. Stebbins v. Signet Banking Corp., Trading as Signet Bank Na, 56 F.3d 1531 (D.C. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Emmett J. Stebbins v. Signet Banking Corp., Trading as Signet Bank Na, 56 F.3d 1531 (D.C. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sheets v. CTS Wireless Components, Inc. (nmd, 2002-06-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sheets v. CTS Wireless Components, Inc.
D.N.M. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spiegel v. Babbit, 855 F.Supp. 402, 404-05 (D.D.C.1994), aff 'd in part and vacated in part by 56 F.3d 1531 , 1995 WL 364555 ; Mallett v. Timco Elec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emmett J. Stebbins
v.
Signet Banking Corporation, Trading as Signet Bank Na
94-7106.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 13, 1995.
56 F.3d 1531
Unpublished

56 F.3d 1531

312 U.S.App.D.C. 461

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Emmett J. STEBBINS, Appellant,
v.
SIGNET BANKING CORPORATION, trading as Signet Bank NA.

No. 94-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 13, 1995.

Before: WALD, BUCKLEY, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed April 13, and April 26, 1994, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.