green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshr
See Blake v. City of Laredo, 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry v. North Mississippi Medical Center
The Fifth Circuit recently affirmed this interpretation of Garcia in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 83 F.3d 118 , 119-20 (5th Cir.1996), where the court noted that the Garcia opinion “seems to indicate clearly that same-sex harassment claims are not viable under Title VII.” Oncale, 83 F.3d at 120 (noting previous panel decision which recognized Garcia as binding precedent on the same-gender issue); see Blake v. City of Laredo, 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished).
cited
Cited "see"
70 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1303, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,062 Joseph Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson
See Blake v. City of Laredo, 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished).
cited
Cited "see"
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
See Blake v. City of Laredo, 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rowinsky v. Bryan Independent School District
See Blake v. City of Laredo, 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (unpublished) (holding that male-on-male sexual harassment does not state title VII claim); Garcia v. Elf Atochem N. Am., 28 F.3d 446, 452 (5th Cir.1994) (holding that male-on-male sexual harassment is not sex discrimination); Giddens v. Shell Oil Co., 12 F.3d 208 (5th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (unpublished) (holding that male-on-male harassment with sexual overtones is not sex discrimination without a showing that an employer treated the plaintiff differently because of his sex).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Blood Assocs. v. Commissioner
Memo. 1995-561 , affd. 112 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 1997) ; see also Brookstone Corp. v. United States, 74 AFTR 2d 94 - 6025, 94-2 USTC par. 50,474 (S.D.Tex. 1994), affd. per curiam without published opinion 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 1995) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cinema '85 v. Commissioner
Memo. 1995-561 , affd. 112 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 1997) ; see also Brookstone Corp. v. United States, 74 AFTR 2d 94 - 6025, 94-2 USTC par. 50,474 (S.D.Tex. 1994), affd. per curiam without published opinion 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 1995) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenberg Bros. P'ship 12 v. Commissioner
Memo. 1995-561 , affd. 112 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 1997) ; see also Brookstone Corp. v. United States, 74 AFTR 2d 94 - 6025, 94-2 USTC par. 50,474 (S.D.Tex. 1994), affd. per curiam without published opinion 58 F.3d 637 (5th Cir 1995) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Sauri
v.
Sauri
95-10278.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 6, 1995.
Unpublished
U.S.
v.
Sauri
NO. 95-10278
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
June 09, 1995
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:92-CR-492-X
1
AFFIRMED.