Lee Marvin Webb v. David L. Smith, 78 F.3d 580 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Lee Marvin Webb v. David L. Smith, 78 F.3d 580 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brandon v. United States (vaed, 2000-03-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Brandon v. United States
E.D. Va. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, et al., 78 F.3d 580 , 1996 WL 88056 (4th Cir. March 1, 1996) (unpublished disposition).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Truesdale v. United States Department of Justice
D.D.C. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Truesdale[’s] Response to the Defendant[’]s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [Dkt. # 30], Ex. 3 (Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case, Case No. 3:92CR34-01-P) at 1-2; see also United States v. Truesdale, 78 F.3d 580 (4th Cir.) (table) (per curiam), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1215 , 116 S.Ct. 1839 , 134 L.Ed.2d 942 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Truesdale v. United States Department of Justice
D.D.C. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Truesdale[’s] Response to the Defendant[’]s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [Dkt. # 30], Ex. 3 (Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case, Case No. 3:92CR34-01-P) at 1-2; see also United States v. Truesdale, 78 F.3d 580 (4th Cir.) (table) (per curiam), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1215 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lee Marvin Webb
v.
David L. Smith
95-8540.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 29, 1996.
78 F.3d 580
Unpublished

78 F.3d 580

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lee Marvin WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David L. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-8540.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 29, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-876-R)

Lee Marvin Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

2

The district court dismissed Appellant's action by order entered August 22, 1995. On October 10, 1995, Appellant filed some papers which the district court construed as a motion for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion for reconsideration on October 27, 1995. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 13, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

DISMISSED.