Giambattista v. Doherty, 81 F.3d 147 (1st Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Giambattista v. Doherty, 81 F.3d 147 (1st Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Rosario (prd, 2014-04-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rosario
D.P.R. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See for example, United States v. Robinson-Munoz, 961 F.2d 300 (1st Cir.1992) habeas corpus denied 819 F.Supp. 1136 (D.P.R.1993), dismissal of post-conviction relief affirmed 81 F.3d 147 (1st Cir.1996) (defendant had knowledge that boat was transporting marijuana; 114 bales of marijuana were in plain view on 35-foot boat, crew members’ clothing, food, and cooking equipment were found on top of and adjacent to bales, branches had been placed on sides of boat to make it appear that crew members were fishing, and no fishing gear was found on board).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Redondo Construction, Co. v. Izquierdo
D.P.R. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 896 F.2d 5, 8 (1st Cir.1990) (explaining that summary judgment is appropriate where the nonmoving party rests entirely upon “conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation” on any essential element of the claim); See also Cash Energy, Inc. v. Weiner, 81 F.3d 147 , n. 7 (1st Cir.1996) (unpublished opinion) (regarding as “misguided” a plaintiffs effort to describe the evidence he would present at trial to prove damages because in “summary judgment, ... the issue is not what [a plaintiff] might be able to prove at trial, but rather what …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Simpson v. Vose
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Figueroa v. Vose, 81 F.3d 147 , 1996 WL 136891 (1st Cir.1996) (per curiam) (table).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Simpson v. Vose
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Figueroa v. Vose, 81 F.3d 147 , ________ ________ ____ 1996 WL 136891 (1st Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (table).
Giambattista
v.
Doherty
95-2030.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Mar 27, 1996.
81 F.3d 147
Unpublished

81 F.3d 147

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
C.D. DI GIAMBATTISTA, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Michael J. DOHERTY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 95-2030.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

March 27, 1996.

C.D. Di Giambattista on brief pro se.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, STAHL and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

1

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons enumerated by the district court in its pair of decisions dated November 2, 1993 and September 1, 1995, respectively. We add that plaintiff has proffered no grounds for concluding that Judge Mazzone's refusal to recuse himself from the case (prior to its reassignment for unrelated reasons) constituted an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., Town of Norfolk v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 968 F.2d 1438, 1460 (1st Cir.1992). Nor has he pointed to a genuine issue of material fact that would preclude the award of summary judgment in favor of defendants Henry and Doherty; as Judge Lindsay explained, the evidence was undisputed that plaintiff was arrested as a result of his abusive behavior. Plaintiff's remaining contentions, to the extent they have been advanced in something more than a "perfunctory manner," McIntosh v. Antonio, 71 F.3d 29, 38 (1st Cir.1995) (quoting Ryan v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, 916 F.2d 731, 734 (1st Cir.1990)), prove equally unavailing.

2

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.