Mississippi Poultry Ass'n, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Agric., 9 F.3d 1116 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Mississippi Poultry Ass'n, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Agric., 9 F.3d 1116 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Keryn Goynes (ca5, 2011-07-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Keryn Goynes
5th Cir. · 2011 · confidence medium
Although it is rare for a court to grant both upward and downward departures, “a net increase [in a sentence] cannot be characterized as a misapplication of the guidelines where both upward and downward departures are granted.” United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1119 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. J. Alvarez Lara
5th Cir. · 2011 · confidence medium
See § 3553(a); Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d at 347 ; United States v. Brantley, 537 F.3d 347, 349-50 (5th Cir.2008); United States v. Simkanin, 420 F.3d 397 , 418 n. 24 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Richard Bell
5th Cir. · 2011 · confidence medium
Id. at § 4A1.3(a)(2); United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Grant (2×) also: Cited "see"
5th Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
See Lee, 858 F.3d at 329 (affirming departure based on nonviolent offenses); Pennington, 9 F.3d at 1118 (same); see also United States v. Carpenter, 963 F.2d 736, 744 (5th Cir.1992) (affirming upward departure based in part on juvenile offenses).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Estrada
5th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
The question, therefore, is whether the district court abused its discretion by including Estrada’s 6 United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (further stating, “[w]e affirm a departure from the Guidelines if the district court offers acceptable reasons for the departure and the departure is reasonable.”) (internal quotations omitted) (citations omitted). 7 Id.; United States v. Martinez-Perez, 916 F.2d 1020, 1024 (5th Cir. 1990). 8 United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir. 1993). 7 remote convictions as “serious dissimilar” conduct.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Brown
5th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.8); see also United States v. Harrington, 114 F.3d 517, 520 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Reynaldo Martinez-Chavez
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jose Laera-Herrera
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Monjaraz-Reyes
5th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993); United States v. Medina-Gutierrez, 980 F.2d 980, 984 (5th Cir.1992).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mendoza
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harrington
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993) ("[Sjeveral [of the defendant’s] prior convictions were not included in his criminal history category calculation; these convictions alone justified a departure.’’). 9 .Harrington also contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant an offense level reduction for acceptance of responsibility.
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVE RICHARD SHOCKEY
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1119 (5th Cir. 1993) (remanding for resentencing although the departure was reasonable because the district court used the wrong method of departure, apparently relying on the government’s suggested, imaginary higher criminal history categories rather than on the guideline’s higher base offense levels).
cited Cited "see" CRAIG MARTIN WOLFF v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD WADE FISHER
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alejandro Villarreal
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See id. at 681-82; see also United States v. Pennington, 9 F.3d 1116, 1118 (5th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mississippi Poultry Association, Inc.
v.
Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
92-7420.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 3, 1993.
9 F.3d 1116
Published

9 F.3d 1116

MISSISSIPPI POULTRY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edward R. MADIGAN, Secretary of the United States Department
of Agriculture, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 92-7420.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 3, 1993.

Michael Jay Singer, Asst. Dir., Mark W. Pennak, Barbara C. Biddle, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Appellate Staff, Washington DC, for defendants-appellants.

William J. Cole, III, Hubbard T. Saunders, IV, Crosthwait, Terney, Noble & Allain, Jackson, MS, William A. Bradford, Jr., Gary Jay Kushner, Hogan & Hartson, Washington DC, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Henry T. Wingate, Judge.

(Opinion May 28, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 992 F.2d 1359)

(Amended Opinion November 16, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 9 F.3d

1113)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[*~1116]1

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

[*~1118]2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.