Gardner Bradley v. T. Travis Medlock, Attorney Gen. of the State of South Carolina, 9 F.3d 1543 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Gardner Bradley v. T. Travis Medlock, Attorney Gen. of the State of South Carolina, 9 F.3d 1543 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: GRAHAM v. FORSYTH COUNTY (ncmd, 2025-07-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" GRAHAM v. FORSYTH COUNTY (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
M.D.N.C. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hinton, 9 F.3d 1543 , 1993 WL 460651 at *4 .
discussed Cited "see" Slonaker v. Kennedy
S.D.W. Va · 2021 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Mere threats or verbal abuse by prison officials, without more, do not state a cognizable claim under § 1983.” Henslee v. Lewis, 153 F. App’x 178, 180 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Collins v. Cundy, 603 F.2d 825, 827 (10th Cir. 1979)); accord Johnson v. Lanham, 9 F.3d 1543 , 1993 WL 469160, at *3 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 1993) (unpublished table opinion) (same).
cited Cited "see" Jordan v. Department of the Army
E.D. Va. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hinton v. Cheney, 9 F.3d 1543 , at *3 (4th Cir. 1993) (Table).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brashear v. Simms
D. Maryland · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Johnson v. Laham, 9 F.3d 1543 , 1993 WL 469160 (4th Cir.1993) (table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gardner Bradley
v.
T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
93-6753.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 16, 1993.
9 F.3d 1543
Unpublished

9 F.3d 1543

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gardner BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T. Travis MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South
Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6753.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 16, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.

Gardner Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.[*] Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Medlock, No. CA-93-1007 (D.S.C. June 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Since Bradley did not note an appeal from denial of his postjudgment motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) the court's orders denying them are not reviewable in this appeal. See Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n.7 (1978)