Joan E. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Comm'n Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp Donald Crump, Case Manager, 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Joan E. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Comm'n Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp Donald Crump, Case Manager, 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“generally, federal appellate courts do not consider issues that the parties have not raised either below or on appeal. yet in 'exceptional circumstances,' to prevent injustice, we may raise issues sua sponte.”
48 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Dwight Thomas v. James Crosby (ca11, 2004-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) James Dwight Thomas v. James Crosby (2×)
11th Cir. · 2004 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
generally, federal appellate courts do not consider issues that the parties have not raised either below or on appeal. yet in 'exceptional circumstances,' to prevent injustice, we may raise issues sua sponte.
discussed Cited "see" Mostoller v. Garrett
Bankr. E.D. Tenn. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Satterfield v. Sigmon (In re Mahaffey), 91 F.3d 131 , at *2 (4th Cir. July 10, 1996) (unpublished table decision) (agreeing with “a majority of courts” and rejecting the “no harm, no foul” principle as inappropriate under the Bankruptcy Code because “all property, including potentially exempt property, is part of the estate until the debtor claims an exemption”); see also, e.g., Tavenner v. Smoot, 257 F.3d 401, 406-07 (4th Cir. 2001) (holding that “the so-called ‘no harm, no foul’ approach is inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code . . . [and] conclud[ing] that transfers of…
cited Cited "see" Brock v. Draper (In Re Draper)
Bankr. E.D. Ky. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mahaffey v. Sigmon (In re Mahaffey), 91 F.3d 131 (Table), 1996 WL 383922 (4th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Tavenner v. Smoot (In Re Smoot)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Satterfield v. Sigmon (In re Mahaffey), 91 F.3d 131 , 1996 WL 383922 (4th Cir.(W.D.N.C.) July 10, 1996) (unpublished opinion). 8 .
cited Cited "see" McCall v. Williams
D.S.C. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCarn v. Beach, 91 F.3d 131 , 1996 WL 393168, at *3-4 (4th Cir.1996) (unpublished opinion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Crawford
Bankr. W.D.N.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Once the debtor ceases to so use the exempt property as a residence, the prohibition on the creditor’s enforcement of his judgment ceases.” In re Love, 42 B.R. 317, 318 (Bankr.E.D.N.C.1984), aff'd 54 B.R. 947 (E.D.N.C.1985); See also In re Mahaffey, 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cosey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
M.D.N.C. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Klebe v. Mitre Group Health Care Plan, 894 F.Supp. 898, 902 (D.Md.1995) (finding that the “requisite grant of discretion may be derived from any number of plan documents”), aff'd, 91 F.3d 131 (Table), 1996 WL 405220 (4th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davidson v. Kemper National Services, Inc.
W.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Klebe v. Mitre Group Health Care Plan, 894 F.Supp. 898, 903 (D.Md.1995), aff'd, 91 F.3d 131 , 1996 WL 405220 (4th Cir.1996); James F. Jorden, et al., Handbook on ERISA Litigation, § 4.04[c], at 4-42 (2d ed.2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hines v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
W.D. Va. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Klebe v. Mitre Group Health Care Plan, 894 F.Supp. 898, 903 (D.Md.1995), aff'd, 91 F.3d 131 , 1996 WL 405220 (4th Cir.1996); James F. Jorden, et al., Handbook on ERISA Litigation, § 4.04[c], at 4-42 (2d ed.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joan E. Marcott
v.
Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Commission Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp Donald Crump, Case Manager
96-6280.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 31, 1996.
91 F.3d 131
Unpublished
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)

91 F.3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joan E. MARCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS; United States Parole Commission; Vic
Loy, Warden Alderson Camp; Donald Crump, Case
Manager, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1996.
Decided: July 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-94-271-1)

Joan E. Marcott, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, WV, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-94-271-1 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED