Thomas Oskiera v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 95 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Thomas Oskiera v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 95 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pence v. United States (uscfc, 2002-06-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Pence v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sumakeris v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 246 (1995), aff'd 95 F.3d 1163 (Fed.Cir.1996)(unpublished table decision).
cited Cited "see" Woll v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sumakeris v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 246, 248, 256-57 (1995), aff'd, 95 F.3d 1163 (Fed.Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stolpe v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
As the Barber court put it, section 1455 makes it “readily apparent ... that counseling was to be an integral part of the notice given to the spouse[.]” Id; see also Sumakeris v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 246, 253 (1995), aff'd, 95 F.3d 1163 , 1996 WL 383929 (Fed.Cir.) (table), (July 8,1996) and McFarlane v. Secretary of the Air Force, 867 F.Supp. 405, 410 (E.D.Va. 1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Oskiera
v.
Office of Personnel Management
96-3097.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jul 16, 1996.
95 F.3d 1163
Unpublished

95 F.3d 1163

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Thomas OSKIERA, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 96-3097.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 16, 1996.

1

68 M.S.P.R. 691.

2

REVIEW DISMISSED.

ORDER

3

The petitioner having failed to file an appendix required by Federal Circuit Rule 30(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

4

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.