Anderson v. United States, 4 F. App'x 871 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Anderson v. United States, 4 F. App'x 871 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 6.4 score

G Cite

cited 3× by 2 distinct cases · “[A]ltering the theory of recovery does not form a new claim under the transactional approach.”

14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Great Northern Properties, Lp. v. United States (uscfc, 2025-05-15)

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Great Northern Properties, Lp. v. United States

Fed. Cl. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

altering the theory of recovery does not form a new claim under the transactional approach.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." May v. United States

Fed. Cl. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low

This court has imposed similar sanctions “[t]o prevent abuse of the judicial process by plaintiff.” Hor nback v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 1, 6 (2004); see also Anderson v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 725, 731 (2000), aff'd, 4 Fed.Appx. 871 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 926 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 713 (2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Garrett v. United States

Fed. Cl. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low

This court has imposed similar sanctions “[t]o prevent abuse of the judicial process by plaintiff.” Hornback v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 1, 6 (2004); see also Anderson v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 725, 731 (2000), aff'd, 4 Fed.Appx. 871 (Fed.Cir. 2001) (Table), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 926 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 713 (2001).