green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
15.1 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases · 2 courts ·
…the word 'convicted' as used in the indictment against the defendant, under the statute ... means that the defendant had been formally adjudged to be guilty by the county judge's court of marion county.
at p. 394
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1930 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1930
1978
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
United States v. Bobby Jenkins
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
the word 'convicted' as used in the indictment against the defendant, under the statute ... means that the defendant had been formally adjudged to be guilty by the county judge's court of marion county.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Joseph Peter Clarke v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
the word 'convicted' as used in the indictment against the defendant, under the statute ... means that the defendant had been formally adjudged to be guilty by the county judge's court of marion county.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. McFadden
Relying on Smith , in Timmons v. State, 97 Fla. 23, 27 , 119 So. 393, 394 (1929), the Court held that when the State is alleging in an indictment that a defendant has previously been "convicted" of committing the same crime as charged in the indictment, the prior "conviction" must include a judgment of the court as well as a plea or verdict of guilty.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. M. Traylor and W. K. Whipple, Co-Partners Trading Under the Firm Name and Style of Traylor and Whipple, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Tampa Tribune Publishing Company, a Corporation, Defendants in Error
v.
Tampa Tribune Publishing Company, a Corporation, Defendants in Error
Frank Redd, for Plaintiffs in Error;
John L. Early, for Defendant in Error.
Whitfield, Strum, Buford.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · Supreme Court of Florida (1)
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be. given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.