green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.6 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases ·
…it is highly questionable whether pearce applies to plea bargaining situations
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Larry P. Lippert
it is highly questionable whether pearce applies to plea bargaining situations
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Palm v. State
(2×)
it is highly questionable whether pearce applies to plea bargaining situations
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jimmy Frank v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
(2×)
it is highly questionable whether pearce applies to plea bargaining situations
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkerson
Ed. 2d 1217, 1221 (1959); accord State v. Boykin, 298 N.C. 687, 693-94 , 259 S.E.2d 883, 887-88 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 64 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tran Trong Cuong, M.D.
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 196 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mister T. Hillary
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 196 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Eugene Bailes, United States of America v. Robert Eugene Bailes
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980). 9 Bailes also contends that Fed.R.Crim.P. 43 was violated when the judge answered one of several questions from the jury while he was out of the courtroom and that neither he nor his stand-by counsel was apprised of the question.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Russell
(2×)
See State v. Boykin, 298 N.C. 687 , 259 S.E. 2d 883 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980) (ruling on allowance of questioning by counsel is within discretionary power of trial court).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph B. Wallmeyer
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 196-97 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Thomas v. Dale E. Foltz
(2×)
See Kibert v. Blankenship, 611 F.2d 520, 526 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitchel Ables, A/K/A \Mitch
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 196-97 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980); United States v. Kirkland, 637 F.2d 654, 656 (9th Cir.1980); and Cf. United States v. Brevard, 739 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. i984).
cited
Cited "see"
Jeffrey Watts, Cross-Appellee v. James Laurent, Youth Supervisor Ii., Cross
See United States v. Gray, 611 F.2d 194 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Castleberry v. State
(2×)
Accord Martin v. Blackburn, 606 F.2d 92, 93 (CA5 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1841 , 64 L.Ed.2d 265 (1980) (`it is highly questionable whether *26 Pearce applies to plea bargaining situations').
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moose
(2×)
See State v. Boykin, 298 N.C. 687 , 259 S.E. 2d 883 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Naomi Samuels
See United States v. Gray, 611 F.2d 194,198-99 (7th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980); United States v. Lambros, 544 F.2d 962, 965-66 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1983
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980), ("[a]bsent ... misconduct on the part of the government counsel, the courts generally have discerned no reversible error where the trial court has acted promptly in sustaining an objection and advising the jury to disregard the testimony").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hines
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194, 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980), (“[a]bsent ... misconduct on the part of the government counsel, the courts generally have discerned no reversible error where the trial court has acted promptly in sustaining an objection and advising the jury to disregard the testimony”).
cited
Cited "see"
Sweet v. United States
See United States v. Johnson, 610 F.2d 194 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1840 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Edward Ehl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Accord, Martin v. Blackburn, 606 F.2d 92, 93 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1841 , 64 L.Ed.2d 265 (1980) (‘it is highly questionable whether Pearce applies to plea bargaining situations’)”, Frank, 646 F.2d at 883 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Verrusio
Cir. 2015) (quoting Chaidez v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1103 , 1106 n.1 (2013)). “[J]udgment finality,” however, “is not to be lightly cast aside,” Denedo, 556 U.S. at 916 , and thus, coram nobis relief “is rarely available,” Zhenli Ye Gon v. Lynch, 176 F. Supp. 3d 1, 3 (D.D.C. 2016), and may only be granted “under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice,” United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511 (1954); see also Denedo, 446 U.S. at 911 (“To confine the use of coram nobis so that finality is not at risk in a great number of cases, we were careful in Morgan …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Dixon
See e.g., State v. Boykin, 298 N.C. 687 , 259 S.E.2d 883 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1841 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McClurkin v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Gray, 611 F.2d 194, 199-200 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911, 100 S.Ct. 1840, 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980); United States v. Kriz, 586 F.2d 1178, 1179-81 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 945 , 99 S.Ct. 2893 , 61 L.Ed.2d 317 (1979); United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 350-51 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979). 18 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hein
See, e.g., State v. Austin, 124 Ariz. 231, 232 , 603 P.2d 502, 503 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1841 , 64 L.Ed.2d 264 (1980).
Kibert
v.
Blankenship, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Blankenship, Correctional Superintendent
No. 79-6043.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1980.
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.