Atkins v. Ellis, 351 U.S. 912 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Atkins v. Ellis, 351 U.S. 912 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
99 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mathis (wis, 1968-06-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Mathis (2×)
Wis. · 1968 · confidence medium
Davis v. United States (8th Cir. 1955), 226 Fed. 2d 834, certiorari denied, 351 U. S. 912 , 76 Sup. Ct. 702, 100 L.
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. Lockyer
C.D. Cal. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
Further, the writ of error coram nobis “cannot be used as a substitute for habeas corpus or as a collateral writ of error between state and federal jurisdictions.” Rivenburgh, 299 F.2d at 843 ; see Madigan v. Wells, 224 F.2d 577, 578 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 700 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 (1956); Chavez v. Superior Court of California, 194 F.Supp.2d 1037, 1038-1039 (C.D.Cal.2002).
discussed Cited "see" Andrew Leo Oksanen v. United States (2×)
8th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Davis v. United States, 226 F.2d 834 (8 Cir. 1955) cert. denied 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Washington (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. United States, 226 F.2d 834, 840 (C.A.8, 1955), cert. denied 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lanna Washington (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. United States, 226 F.2d 834, 840 (C.A.8, 1955), cert. denied 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 . 31 In summary, we cannot say that manifest injustice would result from the district court's dismissal of appellant's motion to withdraw his plea under Rule 32(d).
examined Cited "see" Archibald Lyles v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Medina v. Erickson, 9 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 475, 482-483 , certiorari denied 1956, 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 ; Buckminster’s Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 1944, 147 F.2d 331 .
discussed Cited "see" Standard Oil Co. v. Moore (2×)
9th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Medina v. Erickson, 9 Cir., 226 F.2d 475, 482 , certiorari denied 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 (doctors’ eonsulation reports, made in accordance with hospital regulations); Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., 3 Cir., 183 F.2d 467, 473 (report of U. S. Bureau of Mines concerning explosion); Pekelis v. Transcontimental & Western Air, Inc., 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 122 , 23 A.L.R.2d 1349 , certiorari denied 341 U.S. 951 , 71 S.Ct. 1020 , 95 L.Ed. 1374 (report of company accident investigation board).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Casas-Castrillon v. Warden San Diego
9th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Madigan v. Wells, 224 F.2d 577 , 578 n. 2 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 700 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 (1956); see also Finkelstein v. Spitzer, 455 F.3d 131, 134 (2d Cir.2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Tucor International, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
District courts are therefore authorized to issue the writ in federal criminal matters pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a), id. at 506 , 74 S.Ct. 247 , Walgren, 885 F.2d at 1420 , but may not entertain a petition for the writ with respect to challenges to state convictions, Sinclair v. Louisiana, 679 F.2d 513, 513-15 (5th Cir.1982); see also Madigan v. Wells, 224 F.2d 577 , 578 n. 2 (9th Cir.1955) (writ of error coram nobis can only issue to aid jurisdiction of court in which conviction was had), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 700 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 (1956). 5 To qualify f…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Berg v. Fourth Shipmor Associates (2×)
W.D. Wash. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court concluded that “the twelve month period appears as a limitation upon the duration of the voyage and not as a stated period of employment.” Id. at 521 , 69 S.Ct. at 712 ; See also Medina v. Erickson, 226 F.2d 475, 479 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 (1956) (concluding that “exceeding” language in articles was a limitation upon duration of the voyage).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Duane A. Verdon v. United States (2×)
8th Cir. · 1961 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Stidham v. United States, 8 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 294, 295 , and Davis v. United States, 8 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 834, 838-9 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 912 , 76 S.Ct. 702 , 100 L.Ed. 1446 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atkins
v.
Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System
No. 523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1956.
351 U.S. 912
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 227 F. 2d 161.