Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lukert, 203 U.S. 598 (1906). · Go Syfert
Search
Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lukert, 203 U.S. 598 (1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Murphy v. Royal (ca10, 2017-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Murphy v. Royal
10th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Buster v, Wright, 135 F. 947, 951-52 (8th Cir. 1905) (concluding the Creek Nation retained power “to fix the terms upon which noncit-izens might conduct business within its territorial boundaries” and had not “los[t] the power to govern the people within its borders”), appeal dismissed, 203 U.S. 599 , 27 S.Ct. 777 , 51 L.Ed. 334 (1906). g.
discussed Cited "see" Murphy v. Royal
10th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Buster v. Wright, 135 F. 947, 951-52 (8th Cir. 1905) (concluding the Creek Nation retained power “to fix the terms upon which noncit- *1203 izens might conduct business within its territorial boundaries” and had not “los[t] the power to govern the people within its borders”), appeal dismissed, 203 U.S. 599 , 27 S.Ct. 777 , 51 L.Ed. 334 (1906). g.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company, in Error
v.
Myrtle Lukert
No. 203.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1906.
203 U.S. 598
Mr. D. T. Flynn and Mr. C. B. Ames for plaintiff in error. Mr. Chester Howe for defendant in error.
Published

In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma.

Dis[*599] missed, per stipulation.

Mr. D. T. Flynn and Mr. C. B. Ames for plaintiff in error. Mr. Chester Howe for defendant in error.