green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Graber v. City of New York
See Hesslein v. Hoey, 91 F.2d 954, 956 (2d Cir.) (“A statute will be Construed in such a way as to avoid unnecessary hardship when its meaning is uncertain.”) (quoting Burnet v. Guggenheim, 288 U.S. 280, 285 , 53 S.Ct. 369 , 77 L.Ed. 748 (1933)), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 756 , 58 S.Ct. 284 , 82 L.Ed. 585 (1937); Cartledge v. Miller, 457 F.Supp. 1146, 1158 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (“general terms should be so limited in their appli *356 cation as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or an absurd consequence”).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. United States
See Burnet v. Guggenheim, 1933, 288 U.S. 280, 286-288 , 53 S.Ct. 369 , 77 L.Ed. 748 ; See Hesslein v. Hoey, D.C., 18 F.Supp. 169 , affirmed 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 954 , certiorari denied 302 U.S. 756 , 58 S.Ct. 284 , 82 L.Ed. 585 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Odell
v.
Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.
v.
Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.
No. 557.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1937.
Mr. Benjamin F. J. Odell, pro se. Mr. John D. Black for respondents.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.