green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin
See, Gara v. United States, 178 F.2d 38, 39 (6th Cir.1949), aff’d by an equally *685 divided court, 340 U.S. 857 , 71 S.Ct. 87 , 95 L.Ed. 628 (1950); McGregor v. United States, 206 F.2d 583, 584 (4th Cir.1953); Fogel v. United States, 162 F.2d 54, 55 (5th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 791 , 68 S.Ct. 101 , 92 L.Ed. 373 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Spock, United States of America v. Michael Ferber, United States of America v. Mitchell Goodman, United States of America v. William Sloane Coffin, Jr.
See Gara v. United States, 6 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 38 , aff'd by an equally divided court, 340 U.S. 857 , 71 S.Ct. 87 , 95 L.Ed. 628 ; Warren v. United States, 10 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 596 , cert. denied 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 ; Kiyoshi Okamoto v. United States, 10 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 905, 906-907 ; cf. Singer v. United States, 1945, 323 U.S. 338 , 65 S.Ct. 282 , 89 L.Ed. 285 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Spock
See Gara v. United States, 6 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 38 , aff’d by an equally divided court, 340 U.S. 857 , 71 S.Ct. 87 , 95 L.Ed. 628 ; Warren v. United States, 10 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 596 , cert. denied 338 U.S. 947 , 70 S.Ct. 485 , 94 L.Ed. 584 ; Kiyoshi Okamoto v. United States, 10 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 905, 906-907 ; cf. Singer v. United States, 1945, 323 U.S. 338 , 65 S.Ct. 282 , 89 L.Ed. 285 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gara
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 19.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 23, 1950.
Francis Heisler argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Stanley U. Robinson, Jr. John W. MacDonald was also of counsel. Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Stanley M. Silverberg and Robert S. Erdahl.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.