green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Saunders v. National Basketball Association
In Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew’s Inc., 190 F.2d 561 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 *655 (1952), the plaintiff alleged that defendant conspired to monopolize the exhibit of motion pictures in the Milwaukee area by giving first-run preferences to those theatres controlled by them.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pontes v. Lapatin (In Re Pontes)
See California State Bd. of Equalization v. Goggin, 191 F.2d 726, 728 (9th Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 302 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952); see also Lyford v. City of New York, 137 F.2d 782, 787 (2nd Cir.1943) (the T.I.A. does not supercede the bankruptcy laws).
discussed
Cited "see"
Altemose Construction Co. v. Atlantic, Cape May & Parts of Burlington, Ocean & Cumberland Counties Building Trades Council
E. g., Betteroads Asphault Corp. v. Federacion de Camioneros, 391 F.Supp. 1035 (D.P.R. 1975) (plaintiff asphault manufacturer obtained preliminary injunction under Section 2 against defendant trucking associations restraining defendants from picketing and committing other physical acts in an effort to prevent plaintiff from using non-member haulers); see Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc., 190 F.2d 561 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952) (action by movie theatre operator against distributors of motion pictures that owned, controlled or leased the…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapp v. Sloan
(2×)
See California Equalization v. Goggin, 191 F.2d 726 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 302 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952); Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943); Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Haber, 169 U.S. 613 , 18 S.Ct. 488 , 42 L.Ed. 878 (1898). *472 We do not find the clear and direct conflict necessary to invalidate a state law under the Supremacy Clause, and must therefore reject appellants' second contention.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willard v. City of Honolulu
See First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. Village of Skokie, 190 F.2d 791 (7 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952) ; 15 McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations, § 43.136 (3d rev. ed. 1970). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Royster Drive-In Theatres, Inc. v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.
Theatres, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 2 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 840, 845 , quoted and followed in Webster Rosewood Corp. v. Schine Chain Thea-tres, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 533, 536 ; accord, Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew’s, Inc., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 561, 568 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. v. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference
See Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's Inc., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 561 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 ; also McConnell, The Treble Damage Action, supra, at page 668.
discussed
Cited "see"
California State Board of Equalization v. George T. Goggin, Trustee of the Estate of Columbia Stamping and Manufacturing Corporation, Bankrupt
See California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 726 , 27 A.L.R.2d 1211 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 302 , 96 L.Ed. 680 ; State Board of Equalization of State of California v. Boteler, 9 Cir., 131 F.2d 386 ; Ingels v. Boteler, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 915 , affirmed Boteler v. Ingels, 308 U.S. 57 , 60 S.Ct. 29 , 84 L.Ed. 78 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Modern Art Printing Co. v. Skeels
See Sunbeam Corp. v. Civil Service Employees’ Cooperative Ass’n, 3 Cir., 187 F.2d 768, 772 , reversed on other grounds, 3 Cir., 192 F.2d 572 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 ; Zenith Radio Corporation v. Dictograph Products Co., D.C., 6 F.R.D. 597, 599 ; Barron & Holtzoff, Section 1162.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Catlin v. Maine, Bureau of Taxation (In Re Sheldon's Inc. of Maine)
See, e.g., California State Board of Equilization v. Goggin, 191 F.2d 726, 730 (9th Cir.1951), ce rt. denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 302 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952); Babb v. Oklahoma (In re Rhea), 17 B.R. 789, 790-92 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Okl.1982); In re Samoset Associates, 14 B.R. 408, 413-14 , 5 C.B.C.2d 1052, 1057-58 (Bkrtcy.D.Me.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corporation
See also Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 561 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 . 27 The district court found that standard accessories created and manufactured for one motion picture can only be used in connection with that picture.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
See also Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew’s, Inc., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 561 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 303 , 96 L.Ed. 680 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Milwaukee Towne Corp.
v.
Loew's Incorporated and Loew's Incorporated v. Milwaukee Towne Corp.
v.
Loew's Incorporated and Loew's Incorporated v. Milwaukee Towne Corp.
No. 439; No. 454.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1952.
Thomas C. McConnell for the Milwaukee Towne Corp. Miles G. Seeley, Edward R. Johnston, John F. Caskey and Vincent O’Brien for Loew’s Incorporated et al.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.