green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
AW SCHAFFER v. United States
See Newtex S. S. Corp. v. United States, D.C., S.D.N.Y., 107 F.Supp. 388 , affirmed 344 U.S. 901 , 73 S.Ct. 285 , 97 L.Ed. 696 ; Capital Transit Co. v. United States, D.C., D.C., 97 F.Supp. 614, 621 .” While the Commission in its final report changed its mind, this does not constitute reversible error subject to review by this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau v. United States
See Newtex S. S. Corp. v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 107 F.Supp. 388 , affirmed 344 U.S. 901 , 73 S.Ct. 285 , 97 L.Ed. 696 ; Capital Transit Co. v. United States, D.C.D.C., 97 F.Supp. 614, 621 .” In this case, unlike the Ward and Luck-enbach cases, the issue of whether the barge and truck lines could survive and whether their survival was necessary for agricultural marketing and national defense, was directly raised.
cited
Cited "see"
Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States
See Newtex S. S. Corp. v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 107 F.Supp. 388 , affirmed, 344 U.S. 901 , 73 S.Ct. 285 , 97 L.Ed. 696 ; Capital Transit Co. v. United States, D.C.D.C., 97 F.Supp. 614, 621 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Crescent Amusement Co.
v.
Crescent Amusement Co.
No. 120.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1952.
Philip B. Perlman, then Solicitor General, and Solicitor General Cummings for the United States., William Waller for the Crescent Amusement Co. et al.; and W. H. Mitchell for the Muscle Shoals Theatres et al., appellees.
Black, Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
[*901] The appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee is dismissed on motion of counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. William Waller for the Crescent Amusement Co. et al.; and W. H. Mitchell for the Muscle Shoals Theatres et al., appellees.