green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Groucho Marx Productions, Inc. v. Day & Night Co.
Ct. 26, 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Reginald Merriweather
See Helton v. State, 195 Tenn. 36, 51 , 255 S.W.2d 694, 700 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 28 , 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953); State v. Boyd, 867 S.W.2d 330, 337 (Tenn. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reginald Merriweather
See Helton v. State, 195 Tenn. 36, 51 , 255 S.W.2d 694, 700 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 28 , 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953); State v. Boyd, 867 S.W.2d 330, 337 (Tenn. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. v. Fleer Corporation, Major League Baseball Players Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant
See Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 26 , 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. Casablanca Records
Id. at 22 n.11; accord, Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldbert Prods., 73 Cal.App.3d 436 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 775 (1977). 5 While the Factors opinion does not define “exploitation”, it would appear that a party claiming the right must establish that the decedent acted in such a way as to evidence his or her own recognition of the extrinsic commercial value of his or her name or likeness, and manifested that recognition in some overt manner, e. g., making an inter vivos transfer of the rights in the name (Factors), or posing for bubble gum cards (see Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.
See Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum, 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 26 , 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953); Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corp., 229 F.2d 481 (3d Cir. 1956); Uhlaender v. Henricksen, 316 F.Supp. 1277 (D.Minn.1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Grant v. Esquire, Inc.
See Haelan Laboratories v. Topps (2d Cir. 1953) 202 F.2d 866 , cert. den. 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 26 , 98 L.Ed. 343 ; Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting (3d Cir. 1956) 229 F.2d 481 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel Towers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Three Related Cases
See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Smith, 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 310 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 27 , 98 L.Ed. 343 ; Hickerson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 631 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schaefer, 2 Cir., 240 F.2d 381 ; Wheeler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 241 F.2d 883 ; Putnam v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 352 U.S. 82 , 77 S.Ct. 175 , 1 L.Ed.2d 144 . 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
MJ & Partners Restaurant Ltd. Partnership v. Zadikoff
Id. at 1281 ; see also, Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir.1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 26 , 98 L.Ed. 343 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad
See also Brady v. Southern Pacific Railway Co., 320 U.S. 476 , 64 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed. 239 , and Gill v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 3 Cir., 201 F.2d 718 , cer-tiorari denied 346 U.S. 816 , 74 S.Ct. 27 , 98 L.Ed. 343 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gill
v.
Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
v.
Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
No. 89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1953.
Joseph G. Feldman for petitioner. Philip Price, Hugh B. Cox and Theodore Voor-hees for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.