green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cameron David Bishop
See Werner v. United States, 119 F.Supp. 894 , S.D.Cal. aff’d on different grounds, 9 Cir., 233 F.2d 52 , cert, denied 352 U.S. 842 , 77 S.Ct. 65 , 1 L.Ed.2d 58 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Falise
See, e.g., In re Herzog, 301 N.Y. 127, 138 , 93 N.E.2d 336 , 341 (1950) (citing principle, and permitting modification of trust to direct payments for benefit of children to husband instead of to wife; following change in custody arrangements); Oberndorf v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 208 N.Y. 367, 372 , 102 N.E. 534, 535 (1913); In re Estate of Annesley, 97 Misc.2d 1047 , 412 N.Y.S.2d 959, 962 (Sur.Ct.1979) (citing principle, and authorizing deviation from trust’s terms in light of subsequent (contradictory) will provision); Pulitzer, 139 Misc. at 579, 581-82 , 249 N.Y.S. at 93 , 96 (citin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation
See, e.g., In re Herzog, 301 N.Y. 127, 138 , 93 N.E.2d 336 , 341 (1950) (citing principle, and permitting modification of trust to direct payments for benefit of children to husband instead of to wife, following change in custody arrangements); Oberndorf v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 208 N.Y. 367, 372 , 102 N.E. 534, 535 (1913); In re Estate of Annesley, 97 Misc.2d 1047 , 412 N.Y.S.2d 959, 962 (Sur.Ct.1979) (citing principle, and authorizing deviation from trust's terms in light of subsequent (contradictory) will provision); Pulitzer, 139 Misc. at 579, 581-82 , 249 N.Y.S. at 93 , 96 (citing pr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cannon
v.
North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission
v.
North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission
No. 291.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
W. P. Burkhimer and H. Edmund Rodgers for petitioner. R. Brookes Peters for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari denied.