green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1980 ·
…an american citizen does not have an absolute right under all circumstances to sue in an american court
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…the place of the wrong is not where the fraudulent statement was made, but where the plaintiff, as a result thereof, suffered a loss
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…the wrong takes place not ... where the goods are wrapped in the misleading packages, but where the passing off occurs, i.e., where the deceived customer buys the defendant's product in the belief that he is buying the plaintiffs
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aguas Lenders Recovery Group LLC v. Suez, S.A.
n determination of a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens, the court may consider affidavits submitted by the moving and opposing parties.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cremi v. Brown
(2×)
the place of the wrong is not where the fraudulent statement was made, but where the plaintiff, as a result thereof, suffered a loss
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
(2×)
sorenson survey
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Library Publications, Inc. v. Heartland Samplers, Inc.
(2×)
the wrong takes place not ... where the goods are wrapped in the misleading packages, but where the passing off occurs, i.e., where the deceived customer buys the defendant's product in the belief that he is buying the plaintiffs
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oral-B Laboratories, Inc. v. Mi-Lor Corp.
(2×)
the wrong takes place not where the deceptive labels are affixed to the' goods or where the goods are wrapped in the misleading packages, but where the passing off occurs____
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pain v. United Technologies Corp.
(2×)
an american citizen does not have an absolute right under all circumstances to sue in an american court
discussed
Cited "see"
Off-The-Wall Products v. Hyman Products, Inc.
(2×)
See Vanity Fair Mills v. T Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 871 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956).
examined
Cited "see"
Donaldson v. Donaldson
(3×)
See Newell v. Newell, 77 Idaho 355 , 293 P.2d 663 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 871 , 77 S.Ct. 95 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David E. Thompson, Inc.
See Monroe v. United States, 234 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Canella v. United States, 157 F.2d 470 (9th Cir. 1946).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Ricco, A/K/A \Tony Bragiole\""
See S.Rep.No.1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. (1968), quoted in 2 [1968] U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at pp. 2188-89 and discussed infra. Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 235, 236 , 234 F.2d 49, 56, 57 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956), dealt with a similar issue under § 605 of the Communications Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Bertolotti
(2×)
See Monroe v. United States, 234 F.2d 49 , 53, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); United States v. Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue Service
See Sexton v. Barry, 233 F.2d 220 , 223, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeod, 235 F.Supp. 276 (E.D.S.C.1964), aff’d 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Aiken, Charles Cole, Leroy Davis and Clifford Rogers
See generally, e. g., Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 234 F.2d 49 , 57, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 872 , 873, 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956); United States v. Perl, 210 F.2d 457 (2 Cir. 1954); Orfield, Relief From Prejudicial Joinder in Federal Criminal Cases (Part II.), 36 Notre Dame Law, 495, 499 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skelton v. Spencer
(2×)
See, e. g., U.S. v. Preston, 232 F.2d 77 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 871 , 77 S.Ct. 97 , 1 L.Ed.2d 77 ; Spinello v. Spinello, 70 Misc.2d 521 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 70 (1972); Butler v. Breckinridge, 442 P.2d 313 (Okl.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. Aldabe
See, e. g., Duling v. Markun, 231 F.2d 833 (CA7 1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 ; Georgia Power Project v. Georgia Power Co., 409 F.Supp. 332, 336-37 (N.D.Ga.1975); Ciccarello v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 1 F.R.D. 491, 493-94 (S.D.W.Va.1940).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. Karol
See also, e.g., Duling v. Markun (7th Cir. 1956), 231 F.2d 833 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 96 , 1 L.Ed.2d 76 ; Papagianakis v. The Samos (4th Cir. 1950), 186 F.2d 257 , cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 , 71 S.Ct. 741 , 95 L.Ed. 1354 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wynder v. Lonergan
Evidentiary trial restrictions such as being bound by the answers of your witness and failing to object to unresponsive answers are not part of the discovery procedures. 8 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2152, at 472; see also Duling v. Markun (7th Cir. 1956), 231 F. 2d 833 (cert. den. 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S. Ct. 96 , 1 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosenberg
See also Monroe v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 234 F.2d 49, 55 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 873 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
England v. Deere & Company
(2×)
See also, Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. v. Sel-O-Rak Corp., 5 Cir., 270 F.2d 635, 644 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 870 , 77 S.Ct. 95 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 76 ; Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., 5 Cir., 253 F.2d 72, 74 , cert. denied 358 U.S. 817 , 79 S.Ct. 28 , 3 L.Ed.2d 59 ; Hartford Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. E.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watwood
v.
District of Columbia
v.
District of Columbia
No. 263.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1956.
Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray and Hubert B. Pair for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (4) · D.C. Circuit (2) · D. Maryland (2) · E.D. Pennsylvania (2) · Second Circuit (1)
United States Court of Appeals for the District uf Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.