green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Riley v. State
Lee v. State, 244 Miss. 813 , 146 So. 2d 736 (1962); Fuqua v. State, 246 Miss. 191 , 145 So. 2d 152 (1962), cert. denied, 372 U. S. 709 , 83 Sup. Ct. 1018, 10 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph S. George, Jr. And Ricky D. Jackson v. Robert Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal Complex
See, e. g., Meyerkooth v. State, 173 Neb. 889, 115 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1962), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 705, 83 S.Ct. 1018 , 10 L.Ed.2d 125 (1963); Thorin v. Burke, 146 Neb. 94 , 18 N.W.2d 664, 665 (1945).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ledford
Compare Johnson v. State, 246 Miss. 182 , 145 So. 2d 156 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 372 U.S. 702 , 83 S.Ct. 1018 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 125 with Sullivan v. State, 254 So. 2d 762 (Miss. 1971).
LUCKMAN
v.
DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, Et Al.
v.
DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, Et Al.
63 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1963.
Petitioner pro se., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John S. Mclnemy, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
Clark, California.
Published
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.