Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
158 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review (dc, 1974-04-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L.
examined Cited "see" David Goldwasser v. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force (6×)
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Zuckert, 371 U.S. 531 , 83 S.Ct. 403 , 9 L.Ed.2d 486 , rehearing granted and case remanded for further proceedings, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L.Ed.2d 136 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Pedro Perales (2×)
5th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Zuckert, 371 U.S. 531 , 83 S.Ct. 403 , 9 L.Ed.2d 486 (1963) and 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L.Ed.2d 136 (1963); Begendorf v. United States, 340 F.2d 362 , 169 Ct.Cl. 293 (1965); McTiernan v. Gronouski, 2 Cir., 1964, 337 F.2d 31 , 37.
discussed Cited "see" Mendez v. Macy (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Zuckert, dismissing cert., 371 U.S. 531 , 83 S.Ct. 403 , 9 L.Ed.2d 486 (1963), vacated, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L.Ed.2d 136 (1963). 2 Plaintiff asserts no other failure by the Commission to follow the procedures required by law, and the record discloses none.
cited Cited "see" Keeling v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Zuckert, 371 U.S. 531 , 372 U.S. 765 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mrs. Frances B. Chafin v. Dr. Harry D. Pratt (2×)
5th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Williams v. Zuckert, 1963, 371 U.S. 531 , 83 S.Ct. 403 , 9 L.Ed.2d 486 , on rehearing, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L.Ed.2d 136 ; Vitarelli v. Seaton, 1959, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 986 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 ; Service v. Dulles, 1957, 354 U.S. 363 , 77 S.Ct. 1152 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; Brown v. Macy, 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 115 ; Hanifan v. United States, Ct.Cl., 1965, 354 F.2d 358 [Dec. 17, 1965]; Begendorf v. United States, 1965, 340 F.2d 362 , 169 Ct.Cl. 293 ; Kleinfelter v. United States, Ct.Cl., 1963, 318 F.2d 929 ; Shadrick v. United States, 1960, 151 Ct.Cl. 408 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WILLIAMS
v.
ZUCKERT, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Et Al.
133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1963.
372 U.S. 765
1963 U.S. LEXIS 1727
David I. Shapiro and Sidney Dickstein for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Stephen J. Poliak, Alan S. Rosenthal and David L. Rose for respondents.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 60 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

In view of the factual contentions advanced in the petition for rehearing filed by the petitioner and in the respondents’ reply thereto, the petition for rehearing is granted and the order heretofore entered, 371 U. S. 531, dismissing the writ of certiorari is vacated. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to hold a hearing and determine whether the petitioner, desiring the presence of witnesses at his hearing, either discharged his initial burden under the applicable regulations by making timely and sufficient attempt to obtain their presence or, under the circumstances and without fault of his own, was justified in failing to make such attempt, and, if so, whether proper and timely demand was made upon the Air Force so that it was required to produce such witnesses for cross-examination. Upon making such determination, the District Court shall thereupon enter such further order or judgment as may be appropriate.