green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckingham v. Lord
(2×)
See Abernathy v. Carpenter, W.D.Mo.1962, 208 F.Supp. 793 , aff’d, 1963, 373 U.S. 241 , 83 S.Ct. 1295 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Trent Boyes v. United States
See memorandum opinion in Boyes v. United States, 372 U.S. 242 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 , wherein the Supreme Court by per curiam order vacated judgment of this court, granted certiorari, leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and remanded the case to the district court for further consideration in the light of Sanders v. United States, 371 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1048 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wynn v. Indiana State Department of Public Welfare
(2×)
See also Abernathy v. Carpenter, 208 F. Supp. 793 (W.D.Mo.1962), aff’d mem., 373 U.S. 241 , 83 S.Ct. 1295 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 409 (1963) (cited with approval in Gray v. Morgan, infra).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McInnis v. Shapiro
(2×)
See also Abernathy v. Carpenter, 208 F.Supp. 793 (W.D.Mo. 1962), affirmed 373 U.S. 241 , 83 S.Ct. 1295 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 (1963). 33 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Commuters Association v. Levitt
(2×)
The court may not enjoin defendants from enforcing the challenged statutes imposing taxes. 28 U.S.C. § 1341 (the Johnson Act); see, e. g., Abernathy v. Carpenter, 373 U.S. 241 , 83 S.Ct. 1295 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 (1963), aff’g per curiam, 208 F.Supp. 793 , (W.D.Mo.1962); Gray v. Morgan, 251 F.Supp. 316 (W.D.Wis.), aff’d, 371 F.2d 172 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1033 , 87 S.Ct. 1484 , 18 L.Ed.2d 596 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ABERNATHY ET AL.
v.
CARPENTER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR MISSOURI.
v.
CARPENTER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR MISSOURI.
905.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1963.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
Stanford S. Meyer for appellants.
Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Robert D. Kingsland and Albert J. Stephan, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.